r/Damnthatsinteresting 17h ago

Video 230-seat Boeing 929 Jetfoil arriving at Nishinoomote Port in Japan. The passenger ship is used for high-speed service between Kagoshima and Yakushima and includes 16 premium seats with extra-cushioned seating

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

18.4k Upvotes

516 comments sorted by

1.6k

u/-UncreativeRedditor- 16h ago

A boat that big doesn’t look like it should be able to move that fast damn

937

u/solateor 16h ago

Its bc of the 16 extra cushy seats

95

u/funesky 16h ago

Those 16 seats must have some serious horsepower underneath.

6

u/Ardbeg66 9h ago

You get what you pay for with the new Mitsubishi Flatulence Drive.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/StevieMJH 15h ago

Well yeah those are for the 16 guys pedalling.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

79

u/CrashNowhereDrive 16h ago

Bigger boats move faster than smaller ones. Google 'hull speed'. In this case, the hydroplaning is there to overcome that issue so it can go faster than hull speed.

28

u/Space_Pirate_R 15h ago edited 15h ago

That's true, but only to a certain extent even for displacement hulls.

For example, a Zebra class destroyer is ~363' long and does ~37 knots. Compare a King George V class battleship at ~745' long and ~28 knots.

Both of this ships are WWII era technology (ie. no fancy tricks). The destroyer is not a catamaran and does not use foils or plane.

Hull speed calculation would indicate that the destroyer is limited to ~25 knots but it has a very high power to weight ratio and just brute forces it's way past the standing wave limit.

13

u/CrashNowhereDrive 15h ago

"no fancy tricks" except that the destroyer was basically all engine at 40,000 shaft horsepower for a 1700 ton vessel, had a semi planing hull, and a beam to length ratio of 10:1.

But yeah, no fancy tricks other than building it like a modern day cigarette boat - another way to exceed hull speed, by again planing the vessel. 🙄

Please try to not complete BS things on reddit. You might get caught at it.

30

u/literally_wrong_bot 14h ago

the destroyer was basically all engine at 40,000 shaft horsepower for a 1700 ton vessel

That's exactly what the guy above said. It has a very high power to weight ratio.

had a semi planing hull

Not true. Z-class destroyer has a traditional round bilge displacement hull.

like a modern day cigarette boat

A cigarette boat planes. A WWII destroyer is not in the slightest like a modern day cigarette boat.

I'm not sure what exactly you're arguing here. It's well known that the "hull speed" calculation has numerous exceptions, and it certainly doesn't support the unqualified assertion that "Bigger boats move faster than smaller ones."

→ More replies (2)

15

u/a_very_naughty_girl 13h ago edited 13h ago

Big boats go faster than small boats

...unless the small boat designers do the most obvious things to go faster, like a big engine and a more streamlined hull. Because that's... cheating?

It's true that WWII destroyers are faster than WWII battleships despite being half the size. This isn't some big secret or recently discovered technology. Also small multihulls go faster than large monohulls. Also small planing boats go faster than large displacement hulls. Also small hydrofoils go faster than large displacement hulls.

At some point, maybe you just need to accept that "Big boats go faster than small boats" is only true in a very narrow range of circumstances, and in reality the world is full of small boats that go faster than large boats.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

19

u/clam-inspector 16h ago

Agreed, but also strapping 7,000 to 8,000 horsepower on a relatively small passenger boat meant to glide over the water is some serious power. For comparison, small to mid-sized cruise ships that experience the drag of a fully-berthed hull (think normal boat and ship operation) average around 15,000 HP. So that amount of HP with the minimal water contact on the hull is honestly wild

2

u/Straight_Number5661 12h ago

I wonder if this area has like Water Traffic Control. Like ATC for aviation?

8

u/Swirl_On_Top 16h ago

Apparently has the juice of almost 8000 horses.

14

u/slavelabor52 16h ago

It's called blood okay

2

u/genreprank 10h ago

Good guess, but it's a different horse fluid

https://i.imgur.com/wlrpnnS.gif

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Skibidibum69 15h ago

That’s the beauty of hydrofoil though, as soon as they start letting off the throttle and it starts sinking to where it’s wider, it slows down quickly and smoothly

2

u/LegallyAFlamingo 15h ago

Second part of the video is sped up.

→ More replies (9)

590

u/niceshotpilot 16h ago

I didn't think it was that interesting until I read the part about the cushioned seats. It was at that point that I said to myself, "Damn."

79

u/colecrowder 16h ago

It's the little things.

8

u/niceshotpilot 15h ago

I never did mind...about the little things.

2

u/_thro_awa_ 12h ago

That's what she said.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/Gold_Telephone_7192 11h ago

Right? 16 whole premium seats?

→ More replies (4)

2.1k

u/kds0321 16h ago edited 16h ago

First one built in 1976, 46 total built, can travel between 40-45 knots (46-52 MPH).

958

u/solateor 16h ago

The two gas turbines producing roughly 3,700–3,800 horsepower each

234

u/Valuable-Yard-4154 16h ago

I used to take it between Ostend and Dover. It's impressive when you pass other boats as you realise of the speed you're going at. Quite noisy those turbo pumps at the back. 7 tons of water thrust a second iirc.

123

u/Techno_Beiber 13h ago

Imagine being a fish just chillin and this fucking thing comes roaring by. JFC.

3

u/Background-Bad-7510 3h ago

Wish they offered this again. Never truly experienced these ferries but heard so many stories about it. People going on a daytrip to London, Dover or Ramsgate from Ostend. Transport me back to the 80’s!

Edit: Ramsgate instead of Folkstone

5

u/Think_Positively 14h ago

How do they slow down? My first thought was that if the captain isn't paying attention for whatever reason, it'll be real easy to make a colossal mistake that would lead to a stupid amount of force should it collide with something.

36

u/Cheezeball25 14h ago

I presume if you cut throttle and the hull of the boat stops hydroplaning, it will stop pretty fast once it's sitting farther into the water. It can only go so fast because it's riding on top of the water instead of going through it

14

u/kds0321 14h ago

Its a boat. Tons of water friction. I've had a few boats up to 40 MPH and they slow down extremely quickly when you throttle back. There's definitely risk if you hit anything, but a boat that size you'd see it coming... easier than driving a car in a lot of ways. Also keep in mind the captain sits up a few stories, so he has tremendous line of sight. A foggy day would be the real risk (they gave radar for other commercial boats but logs or smaller craft could pose a problem).

5

u/Think_Positively 14h ago

Do you think the physics math would scale from a speedboat (assuming that's what you're referencing to have piloted) to something yacht-sized? Can you throttle back in the same way with those gargantuan engines as you could with a couple of 1K HP motors?

Just genuinely curious as I've never piloted anything bigger than a 5HP electric motor rowboat.

7

u/railker 10h ago

I don't know about something this big, but the jet drives on the coast guard and navy boats have thrust reversers like a plane - hydraulic actuators dump a "bucket" over the outlet nozzle which redirects all the thrust sideways/forward.

Never seen video but reportedly the almost 90' boat could stop so hard it would bury the bow underwater briefly.

2

u/wd26 1h ago

I mean, if you watch to the end of the video, you can see them throttle back and slow down quite quickly.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Valuable-Yard-4154 14h ago

So it's interesting. They announce that "we'll be flying at 2 metres of altitude" as it is indeed a aeronef. The wings are in the water.

The acceleration is progressive and smooth.

The slowing down is just by the friction of the hull on the water.

The service doesn't work if the sea is too choppy because you don't want to hit a wave at 100km/h.

→ More replies (5)

299

u/funesky 16h ago

Those 16 seats are clearly where all the speed is generated.

45

u/xenobit_pendragon 13h ago

It’s the extra cushioning that does it.

16

u/xteve 12h ago

Can nobody consider the rich people?

67

u/canman7373 13h ago

They carry 250 people or more. So that's a lot of row power.

2

u/PM_ME_JUSTIN_TRUDEAU 11h ago

...from the passengers shitting their pants or?

→ More replies (3)

32

u/ToolTimeT 15h ago

why can't everyone on board just hop up and down like on those foil boards?

35

u/Karr0k 14h ago

That is what the other 214 passengers are doing.

8

u/ConflictMaster3155 14h ago

Big Jet Turbine hates this one simple trick.

9

u/Flashy_Gap_3015 14h ago

What is the efficiency of those turbines? Sounds like it blows through a lot of gas.

4

u/that_dutch_dude 8h ago

at full power they are more efficent than piston engines.

8

u/Any_Show_5160 11h ago

Turbines are about the same as piston engines under load, the major difference is at low speeds and idle, turbines use a lot of fuel to idle, from memory it's 70% of full throttle fuel use.

3

u/GroundbreakingGur930 14h ago

Are these more or less efficient for distance travelled.

→ More replies (1)

193

u/Fanastik 16h ago

45 Knots = 83.34 Kilometers per Hour

41

u/bendersbitch 15h ago

Thank you for your service.

42

u/oddministrator 14h ago

They're called knots because historically sailors would measure speed by tossing a device overboard, and let to run out behind them on a rope. The rope had equidistant knots tied in it and they'd literally count how many knots of the rope the device would drag out behind them over a short time. More knots = going faster

9

u/AgreeablePeople 13h ago

That explanation is why I always thought of it as distance than speed as a child. I insisted on saying "knots per hour" even after the teacher corrected me

14

u/Ordolph 11h ago

Nowadays knot is just shorthand for nautical miles per hour, 1 knot is 1 nautical mile per hour.

7

u/Cirrus-Nova 9h ago

And 1 nautical mile is approximately 1 minute of latitude (1 x 60th of a degree)

3

u/brightlights55 7h ago

Can someone explain? One minute of latitude at the Equator is different from one minute of latitude at the Tropic of Cancer.

4

u/Cirrus-Nova 6h ago

I think you are referring to longitude, which is the east/west direction. These lines are closer together the closer you get to the poles. Latitude is the north/south direction and run parallel to the equator.

While there is some slight difference in the distance away from the equator (the earth is not a perfect sphere) it is close enough to hold true .

2

u/aimernius 5h ago

I understand why you got confused.
With latitude, although the lines run parallel to the Equator and it would seem logical to define a point along a line, in this case it is the entire line/circle itself that determines a north–south position. If you cut the Earth in half and look at it from the side, the radii extending from the center of the Earth toward its surface (for example, at 1-degree intervals) create these lines of latitude. The distance between them is equal if we divide the starting angles into 1-degree increments. However we can also use arc minutes, which is what gives us the definition of a nautical mile.
Longitude, on the other hand, consists of vertical lines running in a north–south direction, but here we don’t define a point along the line itself. Instead, what matters is the position of a particular line. We arbitrarily chose Greenwich as the reference point, and from there we determine how many lines east or west a given line is.

3

u/buzzsawjoe 13h ago

they used an hourglass as a timing device. Not an hour one, just a fews seconds one.

→ More replies (7)

13

u/clegg2011 14h ago

45 knots = 7.5 cables per minute

5

u/Kodai_Dreaming 14h ago

7.5 cables per minute = 15 copper wire per minute

6

u/Old_Anadromous 13h ago

That sounds most Satisfactory.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/No-Emergency4880 13h ago

damn.. that's hella fast

→ More replies (17)

15

u/mrASSMAN 15h ago

What the hell, this is wild never seen one before, how come we don’t have more of these (aside from cost I guess)

13

u/Newsdriver245 13h ago

Long ago there was a run between Seattle and Victoria BC and one of the concerns was floating driftwood, but think the real reason it ended fast was cost. The old steamship was still running and cost 1/4 the price for a few extra hours travel time.

2

u/BaDcHaD23 12h ago

I remember this!! Damn im old

→ More replies (1)

5

u/poobumstupidcunt 13h ago

Yeah cost is the main factor, they take a fair bit of maintenance and upkeep, there are a lot of them around though, took a hydrofoil in Greece to go to an island and it was half the time of the normal ferry

→ More replies (1)

29

u/DopeRidge 15h ago

Fun fact, my grandfather was one of the weights engineers for the 929

→ More replies (1)

35

u/NotInTheKnee 14h ago

It's crazy to imagine that some WWII destroyers built half a century earlier could reach that kind of speed with a conventional hull and 25x the mass.

I wonder how fast the Boeing could go if pushed to the limit.

22

u/kds0321 14h ago

Oh, pushing to the limit a lot is possible. Hell, nuclear warships can get up to 35-40 knots and way bigger. Lighten up the ship with less armor plating and a hull design made for speed vs damage control. Hydroplanes can go 200+ MPH... so if you got really creative you could make things happen, but the fuel economics would be insane.

11

u/fractiousrhubarb 13h ago

And they only need refuelling every 25 years. Nuclear ships are nuts.

12

u/ryumast4r 12h ago

The Virginia class submarines don't even get refueled at all during their 30+ years at sea.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Thebraincellisorange 12h ago

and burning colossal amounts of coal or heavy fuel oil to do it for only short periods of time.

This thing can do it all day every day burning diesel at (relatively) economical rates.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/h3fabio 15h ago

I took the hydrofoil across the channel when visiting my grandparents in the UK.

2

u/Darkomax 6h ago

Wasn't it a hovercraft? Or did both exist?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Vishnuisgod 13h ago

Are they all still operational?

9

u/Bloobeard2018 13h ago

6 still operate between Hong Kong and Macau.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/kds0321 13h ago

Sounds like maybe 15-20 are. Similar but different, we have the Victoria Clippers in Seattle/Vancouver that are also still going strong and a blast to ride.

3

u/Vishnuisgod 13h ago

The Clipper is not a hydrofoil it's a catamaran. Nor are the Hullo ferry.

3

u/kds0321 12h ago

Yup, that was the different part... the speed was similar.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Allronix1 12h ago

Ah the Clipper. Wonderful trip and I make a beeline to Murchies

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Southern_Armadillo_3 8h ago

Who care about how many extra cushioned seats, THIS is what i wanna know

5

u/antek_asing 15h ago edited 15h ago

with 40-45 knot that thing likely wont appear at other ship ecdis/radar monitor since high speed craft usually at 25 knot top, the radar software will likely identify this ship as a bird not ship. also i want to see what their AIS look like in other ship ecdis since its double the 23 knot rule.

→ More replies (3)

520

u/Majestic_Turnip_7614 16h ago

I am very happy to hear about the premium seating, great context. Posters so often miss the pertinent details.

296

u/solateor 16h ago

Got you.

Gallery of where the plebs sit vs xtra cushy

73

u/cyriustalk 16h ago

Those for plebs seem cushy enough?

for extras, whats more? Few more centis of butt cushions and head guards?

47

u/idahotee 16h ago

status baby.

8

u/SandIntelligent247 12h ago

status cushion

22

u/SpectatorSpace 15h ago

The pleb seats on this boat are tiny relative to typical western sizes. My knees were hard locked up against the seat in front of me when I rode it - I think the check-in staff felt sorry for me on the return journey as they gave me an upgrade to the premium seats with quite a bit more room.

4

u/Deep90 14h ago

How long is the trip and do you have to remain seated?

14

u/SpectatorSpace 13h ago

From memory each leg was about 1.5 hours - I don't remember you having to sit, but its much more akin to a plane ride than a normal boat - there aren't communal or outside areas to go and use.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/2012Jesusdies 12h ago

Fun fact: Plebiean in Rome wasn't just about wealth. You could be the richest man in Rome and still be a pleb (in fact, Crassus, the richest man was a pleb) because it was more about a legal distinction of your family lineage from centuries back. If your family wasn't among the few notables of the oldest days of Rome, you were a pleb. Ofc, you were more likely to be rich if you were patrician than a pleb, but there were plenty of wealthy plebs.

2

u/Over-Inside-7254 13h ago

Literally like any first class seating on any types of busses. Yes, ferries, trains, and passenger jets are just different types of bus. 

→ More replies (2)

87

u/grudiz 16h ago

Some of the ships operating in Japan arrived from the Canary Islands (Spain), where they had previously run routes between islands like Tenerife and Gran Canaria in the Atlantic Ocean; they are now living a second life. I used them on many occasions, and in rough seas, the experience was a total nightmare. There were also several collisions with cetaceans. On days with calm seas, however, it was a fast way to travel between islands.

14

u/NoodlyGirl2000 15h ago

the collisions are heartbreaking, but completely unsurprising

5

u/A_Man_Uses_A_Name 16h ago

Jet foils also used to run between Ostend and the UK….

8

u/mbenzn 12h ago

I remember taking this route in mid 80’s between Gran Canaria and Tenerife. Took 4,5 hours with the car ferry one way and this beast 90 minutes. It had a Boeing sticker on it so I guess they were involved in the build?

3

u/Camelstrike 10h ago

It's literally in the title

5

u/EthernetWavesFr 7h ago

No surprises from pisa-oecd results 

→ More replies (8)

315

u/Head-Ad9893 17h ago

Damn that bitch is moving

74

u/AdNervous9787 16h ago

Look! Look how that bitch is turning!

43

u/Glittering_Act_8121 16h ago

That's a huge bitch

10

u/Sharpie1965 16h ago

Keep it in the circus!

→ More replies (4)

93

u/Background-Vast-8764 16h ago

TIL Boeing builds water craft. Who woulda thunk it?

53

u/DrBiochemistry 16h ago

It’s flying reaaaall low. 

→ More replies (1)

37

u/Far_Ladder_2836 15h ago

They don't.   Not for many decades, anyway.  Most of these were built back in the 70s and early 80s.  Their subsidiary, Boeing Watercraft, shuddered in 1986.

47

u/HolySchlamola 15h ago

I shutter to think 🪟

11

u/balrob 15h ago

Your point is mute.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Kaboose666 12h ago

Japan kept the tradition. Kawasaki has been making them since the late 1980s, the most recent built in 2020, and another expected in 2029.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/NPCwithnopurpose 16h ago

It kinda looks like they used the same seats as the aircraft, from what OP posted in another thread

→ More replies (1)

9

u/prehensilemullet 14h ago

Boeing?  More like Boeting

3

u/Key_Pitch5102 15h ago

Same! I thought for some reason these were made by kawasaki

6

u/JeffDSmith 14h ago

Part of them are licensed built by Kawasaki, like the Toppy 3 in the video.
In fact Boeing stopped building these in the 1980s, most of newer one are built by Kawasaki(there's even one going to deliver in 2029).

2

u/readonlyred 14h ago

In the 1970's they also built mass transit equipment.

→ More replies (5)

99

u/Cool_Butterscotch_88 16h ago

that simply should not be

19

u/menasan 16h ago

The wales agree

59

u/56seconds 16h ago

I don't care about the opinions of the Welsh

7

u/Montymisted 16h ago

Don't let the Belgians hear you say that.

8

u/RobinSage43 15h ago

At least they're not the Dutch, okay?

9

u/shornscrot 13h ago

There’s two things I can’t stand. People who don’t respect other people’s cultures, and the Dutch.

9

u/LengthinessFalse8373 16h ago edited 14h ago

*welsh

Edit- very cool to see 5 people got it cheers boyos

2

u/NoodlyGirl2000 15h ago

yeah that was my thought, too. it’s a technological marvel but I bet it produces a crazy amount of marine noise.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/Salty_Finance5183 16h ago

Puget Sound boy here... Why don't we have these running between Seattle and Vancouver or Victoria?

23

u/BoneDoktr 16h ago edited 15h ago

I wanna know fuel costs. A regular boat eats gas. This thing though????

65

u/tackleboxjohnson 16h ago

Less than you might imagine, the main benefit of getting on foils is your friction coefficient goes waaaaaay down. 80-90% reduction in resistance

5

u/ImpressiveHair3 12h ago

Much less than if it was moving through the water like a normal boat, since the additional water resistance would require far more power to maintain the same speed.

4

u/CrashNowhereDrive 16h ago edited 16h ago

This is burning 570 gallons of fuel oil per hour.

2

u/tankmode 9h ago

apparently its 2-3x worse than a conventional ferry or aircraft on fuel per passenger mile

61

u/HeartOn_SoulAceUp 16h ago

Hydro foils are great in fairly smooth water.

Light chop they stay above. Big seas, no.

27

u/CrashNowhereDrive 16h ago

Depends what you call big seas. Big ones like this can handle 10-15 foot swells. It's not going to go into a north sea storm but that's most ocean conditions at most times of the year.

2

u/Better-Culture-7770 15h ago

I rode one to Mackinaw island I believe.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

29

u/tackleboxjohnson 16h ago

Sure hope the cabin is soundproofed

16

u/bacon_nuts 15h ago

It's a good ride, very comfortable, smooth, fast, and just typical boat engine noise. It's not too loud at all.

19

u/Mudpill 14h ago

Partly due to the extra cushy seats

3

u/ProcyonHabilis 11h ago

From experience, it's a very pleasant ride

11

u/tr00th 16h ago

TIL Boeing made hydrofoil ships.

11

u/basswooddad 16h ago

RIP to any whales that are swimming there

→ More replies (1)

10

u/AspiringSkiBum 15h ago

Went on this pretty recently and it’s smooth and really quick. They also had TVs playing the whole time with a pretty graphic advertisement for an ingrown toenail procedure. Good stuff.

3

u/heroin-puppy 10h ago

Sounds like you didn't get the premium seats.

9

u/bogeyman_g 16h ago

I thought Boeing made airpla... Oh.

9

u/marcandreewolf 16h ago

The fish, jellyfish and whale slicer arrives

9

u/Soundwave234 16h ago

Some bond villain shit here.

7

u/fraze2000 16h ago

Life hack: don't pay for a premium seat. Buy a standard ticket and bring your own cushion. Profit!

7

u/Sedert1882 16h ago

That's astonishingly beautiful, so smooth and fast. I want one......for the bath.

2

u/ShartKing78 14h ago

I usually don't give a shit about boats but this one is really beautiful

7

u/Lysol3435 16h ago

16 cushioned seats!?

4

u/Soundwave234 16h ago

"extra" cushioned

6

u/Nervous_Law3061 15h ago

230 passengers, 16 premium seats, and the entire ship appears to be attempting to leave the ocean.

6

u/Prudent-Aspect5085 16h ago

I'm just imagining some dude on the jetty with a remote control having the time of his life steering this thing

5

u/nthpwr 16h ago

This should be in the dictionary when you look up "hauling ass"

→ More replies (2)

5

u/somerussianbear 15h ago

- Hey Boeing, wanna make a boat?

  • Hmmm, can it fly?
  • No
  • Just a little?
  • Ok ok

→ More replies (1)

4

u/AwakE432 4h ago

Fee like the least interesting fact about this boat is it has cushioned premium seats. What a fucking weird title.

3

u/Hot-Helicopter640 16h ago

How doesn't it tip over?

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Frangine_De_Poutine 16h ago

I'm salivating at the thought of those sixteen seats.

4

u/LordScotchyScotch 16h ago

Transport tycoon vibes

3

u/whataloadofoldshit_ 15h ago

TIL Boeing made boats

3

u/Oddisredit 15h ago

I don’t care about the cushions making it go faster. I’m surprised Boeing was involved in this. Kawasaki industries, makes sense, Boeing is a surprise 

3

u/Murky-Relation481 12h ago

Boeing was in major financial trouble in the late 60s and 70s and was trying to diversify. They also had Boeing Vertol (an acquisition) that built helicopters. I think that rolled into the main company eventually (at least into BDS).

2

u/Oddisredit 11h ago

I would have thought Vietnam would have made Boeing more stable. Interesting 

Also in the 60-70s conglomerates we’re all the rage 

2

u/Murky-Relation481 11h ago

Eh, they had some tanker contracts and maintenance contracts in the B-52 but not really much else related to Vietnam. Their main business has always been commercial airliners.

2

u/Oddisredit 11h ago

Oh that’s right. This is before the Lockheed Martin merger. 

2

u/Murky-Relation481 9h ago

I think you meant McDonnell Douglas

→ More replies (1)

5

u/GottaConfuseTheBody 10h ago

I rode on one of these through rough seas between Hong Kong and Macau. Every passenger threw up

→ More replies (1)

3

u/joe28598 16h ago

Is the extra cushion the only perk for premium?

3

u/tonymeech 16h ago

Ludicrous Speed!!

3

u/thesagaconts 16h ago

I tried it without music and was surprised there wasn’t a silly song. 

3

u/GarThor_TMK 16h ago

Heck, I want one.

3

u/himitsumono 14h ago

I rode a smaller version of this in 1987 between Shikoku and Kobe. It felt like riding in a very comfortable airplane. Quiet, smooth, very gentle turns.

We mentioned to the stewardess that the engines were most likely built 10 miles or so from our house. A few minutes later, the captain came back to say hello and chat.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Euphoric-Skirt7649 4h ago

Japan really is an irl video game

Americans would be like “why make a boat so fast and aerodynamic? It won’t make any money!”

Japan is like “we can make it bigger, faster, sexier”

3

u/GOTCHA009 3h ago

Serious question: why are hydrofoils not more popular?

3

u/Silver-Literature-54 3h ago

2hours by jetfoil, 4h30 by regular ferry btw. Saw it last year arriving at the port, that thing is crazy loud ! And it wasn’t at full speed

8

u/Scorpion2k4u 16h ago

The mentioning of those 16 extra cushioned seats is a weird flex but okay

5

u/Panorabifle 16h ago

Yeah it's a surprisingly small amount given the size of the ship. Looks like a single row could almost house 16 premium seats. Two at most.

16 out of 230 seats are announced as comfortable. A great ~7% .

2

u/icleanjaxfl 16h ago

Seems kinda loud

2

u/ProcyonHabilis 11h ago

Maybe outside, but it's not notably loud inside

2

u/Half-deaf-mixed-guy 16h ago

Best America can do is a class room sized 357.

2

u/CherryPeppersnOnions 16h ago

Hauling ass on the water. Damn!

2

u/daaaabeans 16h ago

I remember seeing this in the beginning of rush hour 2. Pretty cool :)

2

u/FormalTotal9684 16h ago

I saw this at start of Poseidon Adventure

2

u/Available-Ad-9016 16h ago

The landing in the end was similar to airplane landing

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Inhabitsthebed 16h ago

It looks like a large wave could knock it over easy, anyone with boat knowledge able to tell me how big the boat is under the water if that makes sense?

2

u/NitroEagleFist 16h ago

Fast for sure, but uuggly looks like a modded hillbilly houseboat.

2

u/bishmashbosh 15h ago

This thing is cool but fucking terrifying

2

u/Inevitable_Boss5846 15h ago

I rode this a couple of times in January. It’s awesome! Quite uncomfortable.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/YesterdayRadish 15h ago

that thing doesn't look 50 years old

2

u/FatiguedShrimp 14h ago

It is so ridiculous that jet foils work.

2

u/crowface666 13h ago

Extra cushioning LoL

2

u/BearelyKoalified 13h ago

extra cushioned seating? huh?

2

u/accwork8723 12h ago

what is the equivalent MPG per seat, out of curiosity?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Keisaku 12h ago

Never knew a ship could gumby.

2

u/ShiggyGoosebottom 9h ago

I think we call this a “jet ferry” in Japan. I’ve taken the one between Tokyo and Izu-Oshima. Until you get out of the Tokyo Bay it’s just like any ferry. Then you have to sit down and strap in for take off.

2

u/Linden_Stromberg 9h ago

I WANNA FLY THE BOAT!!!

2

u/koyo4 9h ago

I've been on it. Supe fun

2

u/Critical_Advantage66 9h ago

Oh! I’ve ridden on this exact boat. It’s unbelievably smooth!

2

u/Katana_DV20 7h ago

These are so cool and the idea is so clever. Water causes a lot of drag on a hull sitting in the water - which in turn costs more in fuel and affects speed.

Why not lift the hull out of the water using underwater wings? Brilliant.

2

u/UncleKeyPax 5h ago

only a bit alower than godzilla

2

u/johndom3d 5h ago

I’m surprised warships aren’t like that

2

u/FredW79 4h ago

Loved to see these at Ostend when I was a kid.

2

u/floppydo 1h ago

I WONDER WHY THESE AREN'T MORE POPULAR?

WHAT?

I SAID I WONDER WHY THESE AREN'T MORE POPULAR?

WHAT?