r/MoralityScaling • u/Maximum_Musician_914 • 13d ago
Morality Ranking Morality of this
1.9k
u/Any_Sentence_8056 13d ago
Plot twist, they were downvoting because they disagreed with “racism is bad”
386
u/itslikewoow 13d ago
Honestly wouldn’t surprise me. Despite its reputation for being left leaning, Reddit can get super racist at times.
225
u/Apprehensive__Belt 13d ago
if you pay attention to it, subreddits like public freakout post a video at least once a week of a bunch of black people being loud or committing a crime, and every single time the comments are just racist as fuck, with every single comment calling that out being downvoted.
64
u/Caleb_Reynolds 13d ago
Maybe it makes it to r/all once a week, but that sub is racist all the time. So racist they made an even more racist one, actual public freakout.
45
13d ago
[deleted]
23
u/Apprehensive__Belt 13d ago
i got banned from public freakout for saying a cop had bad de escalation skills
24
u/Consistent-Jello-627 13d ago
Yeah because reddit is a Cesspool of echo chambers. If you dont agree with the moderators they ban you.
→ More replies (9)11
u/bolanrox 13d ago
I was banned from pics because one of the mods didn't like one of the subs I had posted on and said the block would not come off until I removed the offending post but didn't bother saying what post or what sub it was.
→ More replies (7)5
→ More replies (4)2
5
u/NukeAllTheThings 13d ago
I don't remember if it was posted on public freakout exactly, but a vid was posted that was edited to only having black people stealing from a bakery, when the full vid had a mix. The racists came out in force.
→ More replies (3)23
u/chin1111 13d ago
The random racist commenters I see on Facebook who are out and proud with their bigotry raised punk ass Redditors who are always "just asking questions" or "I'm just showing the statistics" or "they're doing it to themselves". All this cherry picked bullshit to avoid just being an honest-to-God racist.
I'm from the South. Just be racist. It clearly doesn't get your parents fired or reprimanded or sanctioned in any way. And that way I can just ignore you. If black folks are really so bad, help me help you help me avoid you.
17
→ More replies (8)3
u/WolfgangHelnootIV 13d ago
It’s a double edged sword, if someone hides their racism behind dog whistles it’s harder to take action against them but the more people who are proudly racist there are the less you can do about a racist perosn
→ More replies (7)4
u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox 13d ago
call em out until you're banned like me, if we all do it eventually they'll ban everyone and they can have their racist enclave to themselves, i guess
→ More replies (7)6
u/CYBER_DIVER 12d ago
Go to any fight subreddit, if you’re paying attention you can tell who’s white and spamming the n word because they use like a 12 year old cussing for the first time
8
u/M3Panda 13d ago
There was once a very racist subreddit that was nothing but those videos. I dare not speak its name because even that was racist.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (62)5
u/Ryuko_the_red 13d ago
It's just various bot organizations pushing varying agendas across the whole site. Once you step back and see every shitty title and hidden history of every misinformation post (most of them) things feel better irl for a little.
8
u/tattoosandtens 13d ago
What do you mean “despite its reputation for being left leaning”?!
Reddit invented the Red Pill
→ More replies (40)5
u/PorousClay 13d ago
How do you know this isn't a sub that leans right? There are a lot of them nowadays.
5
u/Odd_Thought_9105 13d ago
Moment indians, jews or black people get mentioned its like a klan gathering
→ More replies (130)6
u/Sparktank1 13d ago
I see it as a growing trend in a lot of places. I'll see a youtube short from Uwe Boll's Citizen Vigilante and most of the comments are praising the violence against minorities. Not against bad guys. They generalize the entire ethnic group as the bad guy and praise the movie. It's fucking wild to see.
What's funny is the next video will be a bunch of white guys paying to train the public parks as if they're real elite soldiers but they're still so disorganized and not following their own commands. There will be one guy shouting to others about closing gaps and their form but then when he's in line, he has the widest gap and has the worst form.
I have to go through my watch history to cleanse those videos so it doesn't affect my algorithm.
→ More replies (5)13
u/Coooturtle 13d ago
Yeah, I'm sure the context of this probably is what makes whatever he's saying immoral.
67
u/AceDecade 13d ago
They made a blanket statement while reducing racism to “just words.”
11
u/Impossible-Cause5353 13d ago
It’s still correct. Murdering someone is way worse than calling them the N word.
→ More replies (20)94
u/Substantial-Trick569 13d ago
well id argue, if you act violently out of racism, its worse than saying something racist, so the point still stands
→ More replies (121)8
u/NiceAge7546 13d ago
We're probably missing context. It seems like the racist part was purely verbal and someone retaliated with violence, and that's what the comment was referring to.
22
u/Huntsman077 13d ago
They didn’t reduce racism to words. They said violence is worse than racist words
→ More replies (16)→ More replies (13)11
→ More replies (28)3
298
u/OmniPepperthefirst 13d ago
What's the context of this. Was it like being punched in the face vs racist words to you?
349
u/Peppercorn205 13d ago
That’s what I’m thinking too. Like someone punched a literal Nazi, but the commenter is like “well since you used violence you’re actually the bad guy”.
→ More replies (146)129
u/Wombus7 13d ago
Oh. OH. I interpreted this as racist speech vs. racist actions, not racist speech vs. violence in general.
→ More replies (6)88
u/ethanAllthecoffee 13d ago
Scale is absolutely a factor too. Trevor spewing racist filth from his trailer? Not much impact. High level politician setting policies or even just directing their followers? Much more negative impact that will likely lead to violence
21
u/smilysmilysmooch 13d ago
I think the Seattle Subway Nazi might be a great example for analysis. Guy on the subway dressed as a Nazi saying shit gets knocked the fuck out. Who morally in this scenario is worse. The guy using his words or the guy throwing punches?
Fuck around and find out logic being what it is, a person speaking in solidarity with a group that has a campaign of genocide against minority populations can be considered worse to a society than the person who thought it was ok to punch him in response to his speech and choice of accoutrements.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4497126/racist-nazi-armband-punched-unconscious-seattle-video/
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (3)6
u/bladeofarceus 13d ago
Yeah. If you’re running your mouth in a bar and you end up getting punched, while that is a breach of the social contract, at the end of the day that’s fair. If you’re running your mouth at the bar and somebody pulls a knife, now we’ve gone too far up the escalation ladder. If you spend a decade advocating for the eradication of a minority group and then somebody puts you on a t-shirt, ultimately, that’s an expected and reasonable outcome.
→ More replies (47)34
u/jimmithebird 13d ago
Im almost 100% sure this is in reference to the guy dressed as spider-man attacking that racist pos.
3
3.2k
u/AuroraAustralis0 13d ago
well hes not wrong though
1.2k
u/JustFourLetters 13d ago
words lead to violence, but violent words in context of peaceful people fall on deaf ears.
the punch is far more violent than the command
563
u/Ok_Listen_8211 13d ago
The penis mightier
130
→ More replies (8)4
64
u/TheMireAngel 13d ago
also words dont hold equal value, judging the homeless dude on the street corner ranting about jews as though his words hold the same power as Adolt Hitler is ridiculous
→ More replies (4)6
20
u/beerRunFinisher 13d ago
Thoughts lead to words, we need to strap up everyone to the clockwork orange reconfiguration device to ensure nobody ever has such thoughts
7
u/More-Whole-9714 13d ago
Brains lead to thoughts … we shall place everyone under general anastesia to prevent thoughts lol
3
→ More replies (374)24
u/Mando_the_Pando 13d ago
Yup, also the punch doesn’t teach anyone that the idea is wrong. It teaches everyone that you are afraid of what they are saying. Which is why all of these organisations say something like “they don’t want you to know this”, and then points towards the violence as proof that what they are saying is correct.
People who are pro-violence like to make the argument that if we punched the Nazis in Germany in the early 30s then the holocaust wouldn’t have happened. But what they are missing is that people tried to do that (red shirts vs brown shirts) and in fact a major argument the Nazis used to get elected was that they would get the red shirts fighting them under control.
→ More replies (29)135
u/Optimal_Whiner 13d ago
Yeah but Redditors value feelings over logic. Plus, bandwagoning. If a few mentally ill people downvoted it first, the weak minded Redditors will just follow suit and defend their new found opinion lol
14
u/Any-Syllabub6481 13d ago
Not really the whole things subjective.
You can’t claim violence is worse than words without knowing the effects and context
→ More replies (10)68
u/rednokkr 13d ago
Or it’s an out of context screenshot and the comment was a red herring irrelevant to the discussion.
Post: this cat was abused
Comments: abusing cats is bad
Reply: sure abusing cats is bad but the Holocaust was worse (-137)
Redditors reacting to screenshot of reply: why are these people downvoting this comment that is technically the truth???
17
→ More replies (12)24
u/sykotic1189 13d ago
Yeah, I've been on Reddit long enough to spot some obvious bullshit when it gets shared like this. I'd be willing to bet good money that it's some right wing asshole defending their right (or someone else's like Jake Lang) to be a racist piece of shit and pissy about said racist getting their shit rocked.
18
u/Moist-Explanation-91 13d ago
"I just said they were inferior vermin who don't deserve to share the same oxygen as me, why are you hitting me, so much for the tolerant left."
→ More replies (17)→ More replies (5)5
u/Starslip 13d ago
And regardless of context OP is either the one who posted it or someone who upvoted them and then came running here for validation so can't be trusted either way
9
u/Dramatic-Bluejay- 13d ago
Bro thought he was so smart making generalizations off of an out of context screen shot 😔
→ More replies (11)12
u/ashgs872tbhjs 13d ago
Assigning moral weight to things is a feelings-based activity. You can use ethical logic to do it, but your selection of the ethical framework to use is an entirely personal choice. But hey, whatever makes you feel like your opinions are more valid.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (399)11
u/MediocreModular 13d ago
I think he’s saying that violence against hate speech is worse than hate speech
→ More replies (6)6
1.9k
13d ago edited 13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
207
u/8__D 13d ago edited 13d ago
Well let's see what the context is. If he said this in a thread about Linen Sheets, then I'd think it was off topic and downvote him.
Edit: So apparently the context is the Euro 2020 final, where England fans stormed Wembley and, after the loss, racially abused Rashford, Sancho and Saka. It got downvoted because "racism is bad, but..." reads as minimizing, and the Slavia Prague and Hungary cases it dismissed as mere words also involved physical confrontation and objects thrown at players. I don't know a lot about soccer though and had to use Google translate.
87
u/Dobber16 13d ago
Yeah it also could be in a thread where the racism is also doubling as a threat, so the violence is just matching the danger. Would definitely want to see more context, but as it stands with no context or other implications, the statement itself is fine
24
17
u/_whydah_ 13d ago
The issue here though is that you're again saying that words are worse than actual violence. It's just illogical to say that the threat of violence is worse than violence, all else equal.
I could understand saying that actual low level of violence is better than the real or believable threat of high levels of violence, but the threat is not worse than the act, if both are equal. Just because it has racism next to it, doesn't make the words worse than actions that don't have racism behind those.
→ More replies (34)11
u/Careless_Chest_725 13d ago
Could be in response to the spider-man attacking that Jan 6er and who was arrested. This does feel suspiciously removed from the context
→ More replies (1)4
u/_NyquilJordan_ 13d ago
Yeha in this context the guy is basically saying “but did anyone die?” which is ridiculous.
→ More replies (104)3
u/hexregeneration 13d ago
So my assumption was correct lmao
Doesn't surprise me that the sub based on powerscaling, but for morality, completely disregards context and wants to judge things in isolation to enforce an agenda.
3
u/FounderingFox 13d ago
Yeah, this sub is full of bad-faith actors.
As most subs that spontaneously blow up out of nowhere are.
3
u/kornephororos 13d ago
If a discussion sub on reddit is not moderated enough it always leads to same type of people spamming and upvoting same kind of political takes over and over.
I am all for free discussion and all but this always leads to echo chamber cirlejerks in reddit. I have seen so many examples of it.
If a sub allows low effort virtue signal posts, it always turns to shit.
10
→ More replies (110)9
u/12345623567 13d ago
Within the scope of the sentence, it's absolutely true. There's an escalation of violence, and physical violence always ranks above verbal one.
However, Reddit is currently on it's "punch your local Nazi" arc, and for good reason. So let's examine why.
Is it moral if you, by avoiding violence, go down a path of much worse? Polite society needs to defend itself, and sometimes it needs more than words. Because verbal racism always leads to racism in action, and if left unchecked in violent action.
OP is putting up a strawman, when the verbal racism that is referred to never happens in a vacuum.
→ More replies (12)
60
u/Grand_Mixture4837 13d ago
Statement is objectively true. The motive for making the statement, however, can be scrutinized. Context required.
→ More replies (3)9
u/Happiest-Soul 13d ago
Nah, it depends on the violence, words, and your ability to withstand either.
Some people would hurt less with a punch than, say, being led to believe they should stop existing.
→ More replies (39)
213
u/Type2Torta 13d ago
100% correct
→ More replies (36)61
41
59
u/Huge_Information5083 13d ago
This subreddit attracts a very special kind of people.
22
u/No-Snow64 13d ago edited 7d ago
Bruh cause what, racism is a form of violence. Are we forgetting what happened not even sixty years ago? (Edit: Yeah I’m not responding to any of yall, you’re all repeating the same wrong garbage. Sheep.)
→ More replies (22)14
u/lickmeharder14 13d ago
Can be a form of violence. Obviously jim crow racism is worse then your dad spanking you but I interpreted this as “saying racist things is not as bad as doing violent things”
5
u/BlimbusTheSeventh 13d ago
It can be a motivation for violence, racism in of itself is an idea
→ More replies (3)3
→ More replies (10)17
u/Fantastic-Phrase-877 13d ago
For a morality sub it's always been full of chuds and racist white larping boys.
→ More replies (1)
33
u/systemsmith 13d ago
This is a false dichotomy and deceptive framing.
Non only can racism can be expressed using words and with violence, but words can cause violence — Charles Manson never killed anyone but was convicted of first-degree murder because of his words.
→ More replies (7)8
u/Freak-Of-Nurture- 13d ago
I’m sure this looks worse in context, which is why context was removed.
→ More replies (2)
39
u/Defalt16 13d ago
In a vacuum, this is correct. However, statements like this are commonly used to excuse bad behavior.
As an example, if I saw this on the video of Spiderman jumping into Jake Lang's truck and punching him for holding up a sign that says "Jake Lang Loves Black People But Hates [insert full N word here]" I would probably think they were saying its okay to drive around with that sign.
→ More replies (20)21
u/EarlGreyTeagan 13d ago
Exactly. Let’s say they’re in high school and someone keeps bullying a black person calling them racist stuff every day. They technically never put their hands on them, but one day the bullied punches the racist bully. We’re gonna automatically call the person who was getting bullied for weeks the wrong one for using violence? No I can’t agree with that.
→ More replies (4)10
u/NukaCherryBomb 13d ago
I remember a person telling me one time that they had a friend that had a sister with down syndrome and that one day a girl was talking shit to the friend in the lunch room and told her "I'm gonna knock you r******d like your sister". The friend proceeded to calmly get up and then absolutely bash the girl that said it in the side of the head with her lunch tray. When it wall all said and done and they were both in the office the friend didn't get in trouble and the principal was basically like "well...it sounds like you shouldn't have said that shit about her sister 🤷♂️". One of the few times I was actually proud of the general redneck culture of my state. Some things are, in fact "fighting words", and its absurd for people to act like its entirely ok for someone to just hurl abuse at a person and that they are obligated to just take it.
→ More replies (1)3
u/amiajimmy 13d ago
I was bullied in middle school by one of the other kids that got bullied.. a lot. One time, he was talking incel bullshit at me while walking in the outdoor corridor, and he was stepping on the heels of my shoes over and over on purpose. Then he stepped on my heel with enough force to stop me and pull my shoe off while shoving me from behind.
I didn't fall, was able to regain my balance, and turned around with a nice right hook to his cheek/jaw; almost dropping him. In front of 30 or so other students. And the assistant principal. The A.P. assesses the situation for a few seconds and asks me: "did he deserve it?" And before I could answer, other students surrounding the situation go "yeah, he deserved it." And A.P. just goes "alright, kid (used his name) you come with me."
Pretty sure I initiated his villain arc that day. He was eventually put under watchful eye of admin in high school because they thought he might become a school shooter, based on comments he would make.. He was also suspended twice for masturbating in class. And no, he wasn't the only person in my high school suspended twice for masturbating in class. Fucking school. No expulsions.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/the_boss_of_toys 13d ago
Let's play a game. Would you rather a rando call you the n word or would you rather get beat by an angry mob?
→ More replies (8)
8
u/SaintOfPride201 13d ago
You're on a website where the only fight any of these people have ever been in is a verbal one. Words were the only weapons they knew. They cower in the face of sticks and stones because they never seen either.
65
u/TolgaKerem07 13d ago
What if words cause more than one instance of actual violence? Like, politicians, philosophers or something. I agree with that comment, but there may be exceptions idk
52
u/roseonaglaive 13d ago
This is known as incitement or more archaically "fighting words". Language does have proven impact into the physical world. If a person says "I'm gonna come to your house at x address with y weapon and kill you" nobody reasonable is going to be like "well it's only language so I'll worry when it becomes violence".
Also racism is a broader concept than speech that encompasses all forms of institutionalized oppression of a racial group that lacks enough institutional power to protect itself.
25
u/MeasureDoEventThing 13d ago
Racism is race-based bigotry. We have term for Institutionalized oppression of a racial group: institutional racism. We don't need to redefine existing words so that people can play word games saying that racism directed against White people isn't "real" racism.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (21)5
u/Better_Database8582 13d ago
You're not even on the same wavelength length as what he is saying, he said words "to cause violence" saying "I'm going ro beat your ass." Isn't causing any violence, it's a direct threat. It's essentially admitting to a crime you intend to commit. You won't win in court because you said words, you'll lose in court because you admitted to intent to commit a crime. And you can go to jail for admitting to a crime or intent to commit.
→ More replies (11)18
u/Voodoocookie 13d ago
Then words devolved into physical action. Physical violence is still worse than words, though words premeditated it.
→ More replies (3)6
u/DevastoScz 13d ago
Now if you were talking about, for example, a Mafia boss who ordered 20 hits and had them carried out by 20 different dudes, you COULD argue he's more immoral than each individual killer. He's the intellectual culprit of the crimes after all.
But I think in the context of the post, we're just referring to being called a slur vs being punched in the head. Personally, I'd rather be called a slur. I'm a grown ass man, I can choose to shrug that off and be unbothered by it. I can't choose not to be hurt by an actual punch to the head.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (20)8
u/Terrible_Artist_ 13d ago
Words can't cause violence as they can't make someone do anything. You have to choose to act upon words. Extreme example: hitler said a lot of stuff, but received a lot of initial pushback. He chose to have dissenters killed in the Night of Long Knives until only the people who already agreed with him remained. Only once violent physical action was put behind his words did nazi Germany rise.
8
u/MeasureDoEventThing 13d ago
Words can influence people to do violence. Trump's lies about the election led to J6, and Trump bears a significant portion of the moral blame for the riot.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)3
u/Suyefuji 13d ago
I would argue that racist words don't have to cause physical violence in order to cause significant harm. What is worse, slapping a person or systematically denying them the ability to support themselves and their families based on their skin tone?
→ More replies (4)
49
u/wewebaguette68 13d ago
Racism is violent though, the ideology always promotes and leads to violence. There is no way to do 'nonviolent racism' just like there is no way to do nonviolent authoritarianism or nonviolent fascism. I'm curious what the context of the original post was tbh. If it was a guy being super racist then getting punched for it then honestly based
10
10
u/NaughtyGaymer 13d ago
Racism is violent
This is what I was looking for. Honestly the original statement to me sounds like a racist trying to justify systemic racism.
→ More replies (2)5
u/ImVrSmrt 13d ago
Violence leads to more violence, and I think people underestimate how violent things can get when people use that as their main problem solver.
→ More replies (4)3
u/wewebaguette68 13d ago
Violence should always be a last resort and nonviolent solutions should always be attempted but discounting violence as an option of self defense also leads to more violence. At the end of the day we didnt free the slaves, beat the nazis, or become independent by calming debating the other side. If a political ideology is becoming increasingly violent and powerful using violence against it is justified. Don't make the mistake of thinking that we live at the end of history and that all of the worst wars and regimes are behind us. If we allow fascism to fester it will rise again
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (86)8
u/CantCatchMeSpez 13d ago edited 13d ago
You know exactly what the context was. A racist got his shit rocked, and the inbreeds crawled out of the woodwork to moan about how the anti-racists are actually the real bad guys.
→ More replies (13)3
61
u/DoubleWedding411 13d ago
The guy is right
25
→ More replies (3)7
u/RosesandEternity 13d ago
Thats fine lets just repeal fighting words laws and give people the ability to scream fire in a loaded building.
A predator says dirty words to you kid? Dont punch him because its just words
30
u/Connect-Somewhere-68 13d ago
questions wayyy too vague for yall to be in here saying “he’s right” as if racism doesn’t cover a whole ass subset of oppressive violence. did any of you even think about what racism constitutes other than “guy called me a slur or was rude to me”? bc it feels like you guys are severely understating the weight of “racism” past and even including that
→ More replies (39)10
u/micro_satsuma 13d ago
I see so many people try to justify violence across so many posts. Oh, but now, "violence is never the answer."
5
u/etherealimages 13d ago
YES. Just the other day a post blew up on this sub where a dude punched some protesters and dragged them out the way. Another post that got popular was about the morals of a man hitting a woman back who has attacked him first. Wanna guess how excited people were to relish in violence?
6
u/micro_satsuma 13d ago
No need to guess. I saw those posts, too. It could be goomba fallacy, but the overall attitude sure is much more considered now when it involves racists.
26
u/Agile-Internet5309 13d ago
"Racism" and "violence" are not operationalized here so we cant judge. American slavery was racist, is violence to free yourself from that worse?
Here is the real situation this probably described: if you get free with the hard r's Im gonna get free with these hands and the only person who is going to feel bad about this is you.
(I understand this isnt YOU you)
17
u/Gold-Cry-7520 13d ago
I bet the context was about BLM protests. That's normally when I see "violence bad" rhetoric, and it's the kind of thing you'd get mass downvoted for.
Floyd was not killed by words, though. Nor was Taylor.
→ More replies (37)3
→ More replies (30)7
12
u/Ok-Bookkeeper-2261 13d ago
Generally, I'd say violence is easily worse than words but I also think it depends. Spreading hate/racist propaganda is pretty damn bad, slapping someone is like nothing.
11
u/PirateSanta_1 13d ago
Rascism also isn't just words. Claiming this is words vs violence is activly lying about what racism is and it's effects.
3
u/-aurevoirshoshanna- 13d ago
Downplaying the impact of racism is literally nº1 on the racist agenda
→ More replies (3)3
u/KotobaAsobitch 13d ago
Can't believe I had to scroll literally 20 comments to see someone call it out.
Also, pretending that racism can't be violent and the two are always mutually exclusive is crazy. "WoRdS cAn'T hUrt YoU" black people are STILL being disappeared while with groups of white "friends" and lynched in broad daylight in the year 2026, but sure, racism is just words and not violent.
→ More replies (2)4
u/EarlGreyTeagan 13d ago
Exactly. Let’s say a racist goes on a racist tirade and never actually commits any violence, but their words hype up people to go and do violent things against me versus them just slapping me. I would rather just take the slap instead of someone going on a race tirade against me.
→ More replies (3)
18
u/NewFlight4564 13d ago
How do you think the holocaust happened? Propaganda (words) that led to physical violence. It generally takes words to invoke violence. If you can dehumanize a group of people, then it doesn’t seem so terrible to kill them.
3
u/Virtual_Werewolf_935 13d ago
There are plenty of examples of people saying horrible things that didn’t come true though. The violence part is where you create a line that you can’t come back from.
→ More replies (1)
14
u/TheNotoriousA18 13d ago
to an extent, in some cases violence is necessary
→ More replies (3)9
u/Neat_Gas9264 13d ago
Exactly this. Violence can serve a good purpose. Racism, never.
→ More replies (6)
13
u/Admiral45-06 13d ago
I mean, call me a racist, but that is an objectively true statement.
It's in extremely poor taste to spout how you view a certain group as inferior or superior - be it based on race, religion, gender, or whatever else - but there is a huge difference between saying hurtful things, and actually doing hurtful things.
For instance, anyone who still follows N@zi ideology in XXI Century is braindead and has very poor set of morals, but there is a very big difference between him and the guy who is a part of neo-N@zi paramilitary group that terrorises locals, for instance.
Many people don't realise it or take it into account, but evil scales. There are things that are both evil, but nowhere near on the same order of magnitude. For instance, use of lobotomy to cure homos-xuality in 1950s USA was a crime and a horrible thing, but it stood on nowhere near the same level as Japanese Unit 731 or German SS-Hauptsturmfürher Josef Mengele.
3
→ More replies (20)3
u/Indiana_J_Frog 13d ago
True. This reminds me of when Salieri said "It's one thing to imagine someone dying, but it's another thing to actually take a man's life in his own hands."
27
u/Sorry-Joke-4325 13d ago
I guess to play a Devil's advocate: the violence could be a slap while the words reach through generations to cause worse damage.
Nothing is so cut and dry.
→ More replies (20)
2
u/Gaming-squid 13d ago
So basically a something along the lines of the old saying:
"Sticks and stones can break your bones, but words can never hurt you"
→ More replies (4)
2
u/imliterallyluci 13d ago
Someone say a mean word for Italians then grab and twist my dick.
I’m going to get into the bottom of this.
→ More replies (2)
5
4
4
4
19
u/TheMaskOffKid 13d ago
It’s moral to downvote when somebody says “Racism is bad, but…”
→ More replies (4)9
9
u/BlizzardWolfPK 13d ago
Do they think Racism is just words???
→ More replies (3)8
u/Ok-Branch-974 13d ago
they are trying to minimize racism...that is the point of the comment and why it was downvoted.
→ More replies (3)
7
u/myth1989 13d ago
Need some context op
→ More replies (4)5
u/itslikewoow 13d ago
Seriously, what’s the morality of op deliberately not sharing the link?
→ More replies (2)
8
u/RevengerRedeemed 13d ago
Mostly moral. Racism is much more than "just words" . I think they mean Mostly slurs and such.
But yes, actual violence is a little worse than slurs and harassment from Racism.
On the other hand, Racism also leads to violence and systemic abuse, sooo that gets a bit more complicated.
12
u/ParkerLF 13d ago
Racism isn’t just words though, racism is a system of violence that’s enabled by the culture surrounding it. Words can lead to violence
→ More replies (12)
6
7
6
u/xSaitoHx 13d ago
I mean someone insulting me or being racist is easy to ignore, doesn't hurt one bit, in fact ignoring it usually hurts the offender more cause they are left with no power. Kick me balls or punch me in the face, now that's gonna hurt for a while.
Words can lead to violence yes, and they can be hurtful but most can get over that easier than a permanent physical injury.
→ More replies (10)
6
u/TKG1607 13d ago
I don't know what's worse, seeing people who live chronically online thinking this is correct or knowing that I live in a world where people actually think that words are worse than actual violence
→ More replies (10)
3
3
3
u/Accomplished-Leg6947 13d ago
Maybe just don't be a piece of shit. I think that's the main takeaway here.
3
u/Humble_Papaya_7137 13d ago
Racism is a direct threat to some people, not just a philosophical debate. I know it's popular to think racism is just saying slurs but that's not even the half of it. If someone calls me a slur but they have no power to do anything to me, it's not really my problem and it's easy to shrug off. Very different if they have a position of authority/power over me or it's just a prelude to a bigger threat.
3
u/Mechanical_Rock 13d ago
Statement holds true. Thou it's like a pointing a gun at someone. Pointing a gun at someone is bad but pulling the trigger is worse. We should acknowledge that violence is worse but our reactions to it should be similar, the punishments should be different thou. That being said I believe in free speech all the way down so the punishment for words should be nill.
3
u/rendkjfldjfkda12 13d ago
If I had to choose between someone beating me up and someone calling me a chink, I would probably choose them calling me a chink.
3
u/ArtichokeFar6601 13d ago
Racism isn't just words. It's also things like discrimination and unequal opportunities in life.
3
u/SeaBass1690 13d ago
Moral and a worthy reminder in today’s day and age where people like to chant nonsense like “silence is violence.”
3
u/ArtEnvironmental7108 13d ago
Morality of the statement or the morality of the meaning behind the statement.
I don’t believe words can be moral or immoral, only the meanings that we as people ascribe to them.
The sentiment of this statement is just reality though. 99/100 times actual, deliberate violence is worse for everyone.
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Loros_Silvers 13d ago
"Fuck you and your entire [Insert thing here]!" Is a lot less harsh than giving said person a gut punch.
3
3
3
3
u/AK-50_Ocelot 13d ago
Correct. In this country violence against racism almost never leads to a favorable outcome. Look at the LA riots of 92, or the BLM riots in 2020. When they rioted, destroyed and looted businesses, burned cars, it was the low income communities that suffered the most. Mother's who needed to buy baby formula, families without cars, elderly residents who suffered the most because some hooligans looted or burned down all the stores nearby creating a food desert.
18
u/Kebab_Enjoyer3164 13d ago
This sub feels like it has too many white supremacists.
→ More replies (36)
9
u/TheGunghoGamer 13d ago
I mean, physical violence vs verbal or mental violence, take your pick
→ More replies (44)
6
u/Sad-Surprise4369 13d ago
Assuming the underlying sentiment is:
“Racist words are bad, but actual violence is worse.” then totally moral.
But this word “racism” is confusingly used. Nothing in “racism” assumes it’s only words. Racism CAN be violence so,
If the sentiment is:
“Systematic violence is bad, but violence is worse.” Is just obviously confused.
I think violence and racism are often associated, and so it’s a very slippery slope, because at times it becomes a statement of “the CAUSE of the violence isnt as bad AS the violence.” And then were in some tricky territory.
7
u/White_Buffalos 13d ago
Completely true statement. Words are not violence; violence is violence.
→ More replies (7)3
u/HanaGasumi 13d ago
The comment heavily implies racism is "just words", but the most devastating form of racism marginalized groups experience everyday is not " just words". It's segregation, it's the lack of basic human rights, its systematic oppression and police violence. Systematic racism seeps into everyday life that the unoppressed group will never experience.
It is extremely dangerous to equate systematic racism to "just words".
→ More replies (30)



1.3k
u/CrampDangle67 13d ago
Lot of redditors don't know real violence, but they DO know words.