r/news 1d ago

Iran-backed Houthis take full control of Red Sea coastline, tightening grip on crucial shipping lane

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/houthis-control-bab-el-mandeb-yemen-red-sea-saudi-iran-war-oil-rcna597186
6.9k Upvotes

461 comments sorted by

1.5k

u/Idiodyssey87 1d ago

Maybe we'll get lucky and our best and brightest will figure out teleportation. It seems easier than maintaining a shipping lane these days.

716

u/Hazel-Rah 1d ago

Hormuz is closed to most traffic, Red Sea (and by extension the Suez Canal) is being threatened, and the Panama Canal is limiting traffic, and may limit it further due to drought and El Niño.

Maybe the Northwest Passage will be available? Let's party like it's 1845

318

u/ktwhite42 1d ago

One of the ironies of climate change is the possibility of an actual Northwest Passage.

136

u/WoolooOfWallStreet 1d ago

“Ahh for just one time,
I would take the Northwest Passage
To find the hand of Franklin reaching for the Beaufort Sea”

26

u/ktwhite42 1d ago

That's been in my head since I typed it.

3

u/IndigoRanger 4h ago

“Tracing one warm line

Through a land so wild and savage

And make a northwest passage to the sea”

→ More replies (2)

42

u/ThatOneComrade 1d ago

One of the reasons Russia hasn't exactly been afraid of climate change (they still should be).

46

u/uniklyqualifd 23h ago

The melting of the permafrost is disastrous for both practical and climate change reasons. 

39

u/ThatOneComrade 23h ago

Oh 100%, like I said they should still be afraid of climate change, but the geriatrics and oligarchs incharge just hear "exploitable natural resources" and "northwest passage" and lose their shit about it.

15

u/Grand_Resort_1073 21h ago

Not just geriatrics and oligarchs, big chunk of "flat earthers" Gen Z and Millennials are into some dumb shit.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Hesitation-Marx 23h ago

Can’t wait for influenza and plague victims to thaw out!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

58

u/ZLUCremisi 1d ago

Its why Trump wants Canada and Greenland. The artic waters is a huge battle ground for Russia, US, Canada, and tye Dutch. All three are the ones who have the biggest claim in the waters

79

u/Tribe303 1d ago

It's the Danes, not the Dutch... And you're right, along with oil, aluminum production and critical minerals. The irony is we've sought American investment in this for decades, but y'all weren't interested cuz its cheaper from China. Look where that lack of planing got you. 

32

u/SickestEels 23h ago

Hey man, these wars aren't going to start and fight themselves....

→ More replies (10)

16

u/What_a_fat_one 22h ago

No, he wants them for the same reason little boys piss their name into the snow.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/TheoremaEgregium 1d ago

They've already begun using the Northeast passage.

9

u/BroughtBagLunchSmart 1d ago

Russia wants global warming so they can get some warm water ports. That is why they finance far right candidates around the globe.

4

u/elivoncoder 1d ago

I'm pretty sure traffic already does go through some months of the year. 

→ More replies (4)

87

u/ProofByVerbosity 1d ago

Thats actually a great idea. Maybe Canada should shut it down for some negotiations 

60

u/OldAccountIsGlitched 1d ago edited 1d ago

If Canada really wants to go with the nuclear option it could shut down American traffic through the St Lawrence river. It connects the Great Lakes to the ocean and serves as a major route for maritime traffic to the Midwest. The US would still have control of the Mississippi river route but it would be still be a massive squeeze.

26

u/ProofByVerbosity 1d ago

Thats a great idea.  We should get on that before the passage is renamed to "i like to rape children" pathway or whatever Trump has in mind. Truth is even in a trade war we arw too nice.

10

u/Dapper_Engineer 23h ago

Thats a great idea. 

It's a horrible idea because the St. Lawrence River forms the boarder between the two countries with navigable waters on both sides of the board. It's the "nuclear option" because it would be an internationally recognized act of war.

→ More replies (11)

2

u/jert3 18h ago

That is a dumb idea. This is a legally acceptable reason to declare war, if we did that. Which is exactly what the neo-fascist American empire wants.

The pedo/billionaire cabal can not realistically start a war with a NATO ally without an incredibly strong reason to do so. Which won't happen. That's the purpose of all the threats to Greenland, Canada etc, they hope the countries will escalate and give the US an actual casus beli to be able to invade.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Multidream 1d ago

That would be hillarious. Painful, but hillarious

2

u/Cool_Original5922 23h ago

Their "Hormuz Straits." It'll cost ya.

→ More replies (1)

43

u/Todesfaelle 1d ago

You joke but the NWP is going to be a huge deal as it opens up longer throughout the year if traditional trade routes continue to be unsafe/compromised.

It's why Canada really needs to quickly invest a ton of resources in to increasing their high north sovereignty with something more than Inuit settlements, massively increase their heavy icebreaker fleet and give Arctic Rangers something more than just bolt action rifles.

5

u/Chewbuddy13 1d ago

Hey, don't shit on bolt action rifles. The old Lee Enfiled no. 4's were famous for soldiers doing the "mad minute". It was scoring 15 hits on a target at 300 yard in one minute. This was just the standard, but lots could do more. The old record was 38 hits on a 24" target in 60 seconds at 300 yards. I have one and you can shoot that sum bitch pretty quick. It is a fantastic rifle.

9

u/Todesfaelle 1d ago

No hate. My favorite rifle is actually a rechambered No.4 that's been passed down from my grandfather and I still use it for deer hunting. I've never shot a C19 though which is what replaced them but I'm sure it's still an exceptional rifle.

I'd just feel more confident if a branch of our armed forces were more practical instead of traditional to meet a potential modern day threat. As much as it'd be nice to believe they're all Simo Hayha shooters, there's still limitations.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

21

u/Tribe303 1d ago edited 1d ago

There's a reason Canada is buying 12 new subs, and building a fleet of icebreakers. Here's a news story about one under construction yesterday. 

https://youtu.be/gMCGnE8VJA4

I find it deeply ironic that the subs are German/Norwegian. It's a model Germany designed with help of, and for, Norway. So Canada is getting Uboats! 3 fleets of 4 subs, one for each ocean, including the Arctic. 

14

u/ThePensiveE 1d ago

We can ask the NATO allies (or Russia) for help checking since the US is fresh out of icebreakers!

12

u/McGryphon 1d ago

I was like, "there's the Healy and the Polar Star, right?"

Turns out, that's it. Unless you count the Mackinaw which is on the great lakes, or any of the "icebreaking tugs" that can not operate properly any significant distance from port.

There is the ICE pact signed by Biden, Stubb and Trudeau, but I don't think Canada will be its most helpful self considering US behavior since the last elections, and it seems the MOU with Finland to build "dozens" of icebreakers for the US in the next decade has not been met with actual orders beyond a small handful.

At times like this, I wonder whether MAGA's tired of winning yet.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/DauntlessCorvidae 20h ago

Of all those shipping routes, the Northwest passage has the best shanties so there's that at least.

This is all Trumps fault. I can't even get angry at the Houthis and Iran, they're using what they have available against a powerful aggressor.

2

u/Hesitation-Marx 23h ago

And the East-West pipeline in Saudi Arabia may have been bombed thoroughly.

This is going swell.

4

u/Empty_Kay 20h ago

And the Saudi East-West pipeline is now shut down.

3

u/DireMira 1d ago

Its finally time for the St. Lawrence Seaway to shine

2

u/Useful-Rooster-1901 21h ago

dibs on the cape of good hope!

2

u/wyatt_cat 20h ago

Is there a reason not to send it west instead? Ship out from ports in US-friendly Israel, through the mediterranean, out through Gibraltar to US East coast instead of going east out of Hormuz to US West coast?

→ More replies (5)

27

u/United-Amoeba-8460 1d ago

I’d rather we remove our collective dependence on mineral slime.

52

u/ThePensiveE 1d ago

Oh sorry, those researchers couldn't get visas 🤷‍♂️

Maybe if we ask the Chinese nicely they'll give us the future technologies.

7

u/assholetoall 1d ago

Does it count as giving if they succeeded in taking control of the region?

15

u/AliceLunar 1d ago

Shipping lanes were fine until some moron got involved and ruined it for the entire world.

10

u/LikesPez 1d ago

Unfortunately Donnie got involved in a conflict he “knew” could be handled by bombs and missiles. That MF thought wrong and now ground troops will be required to clear that out.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Zamunda_Space_Agency 1d ago

Sorry our current subscription plan doesn't cover best and brightest. Best we have is terrible and mediocre. Basically a flickering nightlight is the best we have.

8

u/TheRadBaron 23h ago

Stop making excuses for Trump, these are very easy issues to avoid.

3

u/mcpierceaim 1d ago

Why hasn't Elmo built a teleporting submarine yet?

14

u/AverageLiberalJoe 1d ago

I think the answer could actually be simple.

We stop funding Israel. Iran opens the straights.

Everybody wins.

9

u/Covert-Pawperation 23h ago

Sadly, we are considered “radical” for thinking we should stop funding Israel and we shouldn’t even be in this war. Ugh

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ThiccElephant 1d ago

The oil companies would like a word with you.

2

u/RespectmanNappa 19h ago

That didn’t work out very well for the octupi of Damascus

→ More replies (12)

770

u/mlorusso4 1d ago

Not only the coastline, they’re even island hopping now. How are the saudis this inept that they’re losing one of the most difficult types of military operations?

629

u/WhiteLycan2020 1d ago

Saudis hire mercenaries. They don’t have any skin in the game besides a paycheck.

They ain’t giving up their lives for a quick buck

334

u/FlautenceWizard 1d ago edited 17h ago

People never learn. Machiaveill wrote almost 500 years ago that a mercenary army is the worst type of army you can possibly have. Even conscripts are better.

It doesn't matter how skilled they are, they're fighting for money and have no real loyalty. They will jump ship if things get too tough or if they get a better offer.

55

u/N_Meister 21h ago edited 21h ago

The segment Machiavelli wrote on mercenary armies is this:

I say, therefore, that the arms with which a prince defends his state are either his own, or they are mercenaries, auxiliaries, or mixed. Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy.

The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you. They are ready enough to be your soldiers whilst you do not make war, but if war comes they take themselves off or run from the foe; which I should have little trouble to prove, for the ruin of Italy has been caused by nothing else than by resting all her hopes for many years on mercenaries, and although they formerly made some display and appeared valiant amongst themselves, yet when the foreigners came they showed what they were.

(From The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli)

35

u/blackflamerose 23h ago

Which is why I have seriously wondered why no one has offered to buy out the mercs. No one can match Saudi money or whatever else they may have offered?

157

u/ZgBlues 22h ago edited 21h ago

No. As Machiavelli pointed out centuries ago, the problem with mercs is not just that they can switch sides at any point.

It’s also that they are paid wages as long as they fight, so it’s in their best interest to drag out every war for as long as possible.

Simply put, they are paid to fight, not to win fights.

(And another drawback is that in those rare cases when they actually win, they usually loot and destroy everything in sight, leaving behind scorched barren areas that the party hiring them has no use for.)

In this case, Saudis are practically a thinly disguised slave-owning feudal monarchy. Nobody they hire gives a fuck about anything other than the next paycheck because they have no concept of a “career.”

It’s not like you can do an amazing job against the Houthis and get promoted to general or whatever. The generals will always be some royal dude’s barely literate cousins.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

53

u/monkeyhitman 1d ago

I ain't respawning buying for this round was expensive

5

u/sapphon 23h ago edited 12h ago

OK, here's a rifle, it's for your son. I expect to see him at killing and dying training tomorrow morning!

If you find you've begun looking for ways out of this situation - even otherwise unideal ones - gartz! You now understand mercenaries. They are for when you don't particularly need a job done well, but desperately need that it not be done by you or anyone you like.

2

u/ArugulaElectronic478 21h ago

You say that but Wagner took some of the hardest defended cities early in the Russo-Ukraine war.

→ More replies (3)

76

u/Woodpeckershurtmyear 1d ago

Plus Saudi's have been genociding the Yemeni local population similar to Israel. It's small wonder many of them turned when they could

3

u/ResidentSuperfly 10h ago

Don't forget the US also supported the Saudi's in their blockade against the Houthis, which hold the majority of the population of Yemen, starving thousands. The US has their hands bloody. Also don't forget under Obama they bombed a wedding in Yemen too.

→ More replies (2)

175

u/Tearakan 1d ago

Saudi military is designed for internal conflict. Like preventing coups or preventing uprisings not external force projection

3

u/CptJacksp 13h ago

Ah, the Imperium of Man approach.

Keep the army just good enough to be okay, but NOT good enough that we risk another Horus Heresy

→ More replies (3)

16

u/OrderFlowsTrader 1d ago

Or protect women from rapists.

17

u/midwestia 1d ago

or to protect people from having different religions

5

u/OrderFlowsTrader 23h ago

That too. It is not a military for sure.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

230

u/yetanothrmate 1d ago

because their defences relies HEAVELY on the US Support .. trump spread that support Thin to a point theres no imidiate resources to help push back ... they will likely be pushed back but till then the damage on Oil prices is done

159

u/KinkyPaddling 1d ago

And some other factors include:

  1. The Saudi Arabian military is under strength for its paper size due to a high turnover rate of soldiers and non-appointed officers. Few turn military service into a profession, and this includes technical specialists.

  2. The military lacks a proper professional officer corps of NCOs. The Saudis usually give officer positions to members of the Royal Family or their friends, and this means that a lack of discipline and professionalism permeates the officer corps.

  3. The Saudi military is, at its heart, an expensive police force. As you said, they rely heavily on American aid and protection against foreign threats. But by stacking entire military leadership structure with friends and family members, regardless of competency level, they have military into a structure which has the priority of protecting the position of the Royal Family first, and protecting the sovereignty of their nation second.

34

u/OldAccountIsGlitched 1d ago

Pretty much. MBS is a little more competent than his predecessors except when it comes to the military. He was probably behind the original invasion in 2015 and that was a fiasco. I'm sure part of it is that he wants to avoid giving too much power to the military to avoid the risk of a coup. But that just makes them unqualified to fight a war.

Although their blockades and strikes on civilian infrastructure has reached genocide levels of famine. They've got a lot of expensive toys and are happy to bomb shit from positions where the Houthis can't hit back.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/ThatOneComrade 23h ago

What purposefully gimping your army to keep them from being strong enough to perform a coup does to a nation state.

3

u/CosineDanger 1d ago

They're more effective than you'd think for a nepotism-based Air Force. Most of the princes rise to the occasion and manage to take off and land in the American jets they nepo'd so hard to get into. They have a lot of helicopter accidents, but who doesn't?

83

u/mawhrinskeleton 1d ago

A lot of that support has also been bombed into smithereens by Iranian drones and missiles

The supply bases in Bahrain and Kuwait are pretty much done for

26

u/Nick_the_bunny 1d ago

this and ukraine just show how useful drones will be in warfare, who needs billion/multi million dollar missiles when <5k dollar drones are easier and almost as effective

17

u/sllop 1d ago

Drones have made navies irrelevant. The radars that Iran destroyed in the Middle East will almost certainly never be rebuilt.

We are in a new era of warfare, and the DoD hasn’t seemed to realize it yet. Like at all.

14

u/urbanhawk1 1d ago

I think there is a place for navies but it will be a different role. You will still need ships for policing actions and control over local waterways in times of peace. Additionally, if you do want to deliver strikes against an enemy who has an ocean between you and them, or at least a great deal of distance, you will need a platform to deliver drones/missiles to them since most drones don't have the range. They probably won't be super carrier sized though.

Submarines still haven't been made irrelevant by drones. They still remain very difficult to take out, can attack deep targets with less warning, and can attack from angles AA systems might not be set up to intercept. I expect them to still have a strong role going forwards.

3

u/Throwaway5432154322 22h ago

Check out “On The Origins Of Victory: How Disruptive Military Innovation Determines the Fates of Great Powers” by Krepinevich. General/ former SECDEF Mattis recommended it in an essay he wrote, it is a great read, dealing with how military-technological innovations have altered or, more interestingly, NOT altered the strategic and/or geopolitical landscape in modern history. It is critical reading, IMO, for understanding where we’re at right now in terms of military technology.

13

u/Nick_the_bunny 1d ago

seems war does, in fact, change.

7

u/johnis12 1d ago

Doubt they'll change anytime soon too. MIC needs to get their billions of dollars for their overproced shit. Might be wrong but think I heard they even cancelled contracts for Drones.

2

u/tpolakov1 22h ago

Boeing and RTX have been in that business back when drones were just the big UAVs. They would have no issues making products and minting out contracts that would give them as good, if not better margins and turnaround.

It's more that contracts and procurement broadly follow policy and ideological line of the executive, and the current one has been set in stone a long time before the current situation.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Throwaway5432154322 22h ago

>drones have made navies irrelevant

They said the same thing about the torpedo in the 1800s. Obviously, that turned out not to be true.

War isn’t linear. Unmanned strike capabilities and counter-drone capabilities are playing a constant game of leapfrog. Right now it’s better for the offensive side of things. That isn’t going to be the case for long, and DoD knows it. I know this because I work in the defense industry and see the kind of technologies being created and now procured at scale by our military.

Concluding that “navies are no longer relevant” because of “drones” is not accurate in the slightest.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/OrderFlowsTrader 1d ago

iranians are brilliant for sure as they have a strategy and execute it very well 

7

u/Covert-Pawperation 23h ago

Yeah, Trump underestimated them- and also, their terrain… they have that going for them. If he puts boots on the ground , it will be devastating loss of lives for our military.
He is not concerned bc no billionaires have kids in the military.

2

u/OrderFlowsTrader 23h ago

Bingo!! Their kids not in military AND they become even more richer off these wars!! Just look at the price manipulation going on in US markets. The Biden family does not even fit in the amateur column of grifters compared to trumps.

3

u/donaldfranklinhornii 20h ago

Do we have any proof, other than Hunter Biden, that the Biden administration was full of grifters?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

9

u/OrderFlowsTrader 1d ago

trump is a fool to get involved in the middle east

11

u/oh_what_a_surprise 1d ago

You could also stop right before the word "to" in that sentence and it would still be true.

2

u/TheBigCore 22h ago

And the biggest fools of all were the ones who voted for Trump in the first place.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

56

u/ThePensiveE 1d ago

The Saudis largely rely on what are essentially mercenary armies. It's more complicated than that but suffice to say their ground forces are limited.

8

u/OrderFlowsTrader 1d ago

Those fat overpaid so called soldiers cannot run a mile in twenty minutes!!

→ More replies (2)

6

u/HigherandHigherDown 22h ago

Do you want competent armed forces, or ones that are definitely never going to launch a coup? The despot's dilemma.

2

u/ThePensiveE 22h ago

Precisely why so many positions in the US military are currently not filled.

22

u/PsychologicalSet8678 1d ago

Saudi is a meme state, they are just the US' cash cow.

9

u/Clemendive 23h ago

The Saudi are incompetent but also when the yemeni civil war began most of the army officers sided with the Houthis. They're not a ragtag group of militias they have a professional military leadership.

13

u/Mend1cant 22h ago

Yes. There’s been some good writings on this since the Iran-Iraq war. Basically middle eastern countries tend to be so heavily stratified in social power that they cannot function with modern warfighting without being handheld by stronger militaries. It’s why Iraq folded like laundry twice, why none of them are bothering to stand up to Iran, why Israel won their war in a week. 

The big example is Americans struggling to train local forces, where in one instance when training them to use tanks they gave every crew member the manual to learn how to operate and maintain the tank. Their officers then walked by, took the manuals, and reprimanded the men. They weren’t allowed to know things that they weren’t directly told by superiors. 

Zero room to make decisions at a low level, which makes them incredibly incapable of handling insurgent forces, where guerrilla tactics force improvised decisions to happen at the low level. 

2

u/pudding7 20h ago

5

u/Mend1cant 19h ago

Exact one I was thinking of. 

3

u/Hussar223 23h ago

saudis dont want to put their own boots on the ground, and airpower alone cant hold ground.

the mercenaries they employ to fight in yemen will sure as hell not die for some island.

2

u/jcpopm 14h ago

The Saudis are more into dismembering journalists and flying planes into buildings, no one could accuse them of having a competent military.

→ More replies (4)

365

u/Seven19td 1d ago

This is all such a shit show.

248

u/damnthistrafficjam 1d ago

Gotta hand it to Trump. He seems inordinately capable of making any given situation FUBAR.

80

u/Armadylio 23h ago

I mean you gotta have some real snatching-defeat-from-jaw-of-victory skills to bankrupt 4 casinos 

46

u/HoightyToighty 23h ago

As it happens, that wasn't just incompetence; it was fraud, also.

Notice that Trump's personal wealth just keeps rising throughout all of these debacles? That's the point.

7

u/peon2 20h ago

It was a lot of stuff. Trump incompetence and illegal activity certainly played a factor but really the biggest thing was just Atlantic City in general.

Between Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun opening, and airline deregulation cutting the cost of flights so it became affordable for an average person to go to Vegas, Atlantic city saw a huge drop off in tourism. In a very short period AC went from the only affordable gambling destination for the east coast to having competition both that was equal driving distance from NY and also Vegas flights being affordable.

Trump wasn't the only casino owner to go bankrupt and close up shop. It was mostly a matter of circumstances. AC to this day still doesn't have as many casinos as they did back then because they went from a monopoly to having competition.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/afsdjkll 23h ago

He could have literally done nothing and we would be infinitely better off than we are at this point.

I wonder how we're doing with all those human rights violations he was pretending to care about a few months ago.

5

u/GumboMustBeDestroyed 23h ago

Trump did his part to destabilize the middle east in time for the 25th anniversary of 9/11

3

u/grio 10h ago

He must be made an example of by the next administration. Sabotage of an entire country and by extension, the world, can't go unpunished severely, or it will keep happening.

2

u/Kevin-W 16h ago

An avoidable one at that.

→ More replies (6)

82

u/and_off_she_fucked 1d ago

Satellite images showed that they blew up the Saudi East-West Pipeline yesterday. Goodbye to another 5M barrels a day.

3

u/kstargate-425 7h ago

Again. Theyve hit it a few times shutting it down and its still down now. We are talking about a 1,200km pipeline that is impossible to protect and that carries 5% of the worlds daily oil supply

→ More replies (1)

332

u/HolyMoleyGuacamoly 1d ago

good thing they’ve been cancelling every green energy project possible! 4D chess mr. president

20

u/ShleepMasta 17h ago

4D Chess, Republicans. They've been sabotaging any efforts at Green energy long before Trump was even thinking about politics. Trump is the culmination of that.

2

u/kstargate-425 7h ago

Yeah paying out over $4 BILLION to cancel a dozen green energy projects and offshore wind farms so they will not build them is wild. Then they are giving more subsidies to build gas-turbine energy production facilities going from the cheapest energy production to one of the most expensive energy production methods while adding BILLIONS more to the oil companies already $30 BILLION annual subsidies.

2

u/AtOurGates 4h ago

It is (sad) funny that this would make such a great excuse for Trump if he hadn’t been so anti-electrification his entire career.

“We don’t need oil! We’ll get our energy from the sun and all drive Trump-brand battery powered EVs! We’ve got the best EVs! Everybody’s saying so!”

Instead, he’s done everything he can to keep Americans from affordable transportation.

→ More replies (1)

252

u/WhaleNationals 1d ago

Thanks, Hegseth! So glad that firing the generals who warned about ALL OF THIS has worked out so well for us.

59

u/Narradisall 22h ago

Yeah, but they were like, really low on testosterone!

51

u/GetBAK1 23h ago

Aren't the Houthis just the government of Yemen at this point?

18

u/jenny_905 19h ago

Pretty much. They control much of the Yemeni military too.

I think it's safe to say they're in charge.

7

u/Wizardof1000Kings 19h ago

About the only major city not controlled by the Houthis is Aden. If that falls, the Houthis essentially will control all of Yemen.

36

u/corgiperson 21h ago

They are. They govern 80% of the Yemeni people. To call them a rebel group or terrorists is really outing your political position in relation to Yemen and Saudi Arabia.

3

u/the4thwave 13h ago

Its outlining your political position in relation to imperialism in general.

→ More replies (1)

597

u/Scout_Dee 1d ago

Get ready for another round of 'global supply chain disruptions' as an excuse for doubled shipping prices

283

u/ThePensiveE 1d ago

To be fair if ships start blowing up in the Red Sea it won't just be an excuse.

294

u/wasraelx 1d ago edited 1d ago

I mean, Trump told the captains of the ships to ‘just have some guts.’

As Jon Stewart said: I know you might not wanna steer the world’s slowest ships, with the world’s most flammable cargo, through the world’s most active war zone, but what if I told you… [chicken noises]

58

u/SuperVaderMinion 1d ago

18

u/wasraelx 1d ago

Hahha, thanks for the link that was a nice watch

32

u/ours 1d ago

I've had a friend make a fuss because our flight was cancelled due to a typhoon passing through the region.

His idiotic comment was that the pilot was a wimp for not flying into a typhoon...

It's... interesting to learn that he was actually POTUS material.

3

u/pazoned 23h ago

Na he should have suggested nuking the typhoon. Show it who's boss.

27

u/Commercial_Half_2170 1d ago

“Some of you may die…”

2

u/OrderFlowsTrader 1d ago

And no more insurance 

2

u/toothless_budgie 3h ago

The US is covering US flagged vessels.

So, y'know, the taxpayers.

→ More replies (1)

45

u/WhiteLycan2020 1d ago

How is it an excuse? Insurance rates for these ships are probably through the roof because you never know when a drone or stray missile hits

15

u/ProofByVerbosity 1d ago

If you can even get insurance. Id hazard a guess a lot of them dont have it anyway.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/vestayekta 1d ago edited 1d ago

I mean, it's real and not an excuse.

→ More replies (7)

54

u/newleafkratom 1d ago

…”Houthi spokesman Mohammed Abdulsalam said on X on Thursday that “freedom of navigation and international trade through the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab remain safe and uninterrupted,” adding that “there is no need for international concern” about the strait….”

61

u/Paraparo 1d ago

In fairness the houthis probably have more of a specific bone to pick with the Saudis, and probably aren't exactly in the mood to risk drawing international ire right now. The worst thing they can do is give too much excuse for a more competent player that the Saudis to get involved, especially if they think they're on the upswing.

→ More replies (5)

10

u/corgiperson 22h ago

This is basically true. They’re only targeting Saudi ships.

154

u/One-Emu-1103 1d ago

I don't think that this is a good thing for the West

151

u/sockmeistergeneral 1d ago

Right wing governments will blame the economic fallout on immigration and the cycle will continue.

20

u/Tigglebee 22h ago

Yeah don’t get your hopes up that MAGA will learn any actual lessons about provoking needless wars and isolating our allies.

11

u/sockmeistergeneral 22h ago

Yeah that's my point.

They start a war, which cause a economic downturn, find a demographic to scapegoat, get into power by promising to punish said demographic, use the power to enrich themselves, become unpopular then finally they start a war to rouse nationalism and distract from their rampant corruption. Then the cycle repeats anew.

→ More replies (1)

60

u/rx_bandit90 1d ago

We were tired of all the "winning"

30

u/shutyourgob 1d ago

We will pay every American adult $5,000 to stop bringing up that we're losing the war.

9

u/fiestyoldbat 1d ago

Only if the republicans win... new qualifiers re being added daily.

→ More replies (2)

94

u/OrangeRadiohead 1d ago

No shit. This is all due to Trump. He acts like a child. He's impulsive, doesn't consider the consequences of his actions and throws his toys out of his was when he doesn't get what he wants.

Trump has been a huge disturbance with global security and wellbeing.

6

u/TomT060404 22h ago

..but Biden! Trump is claiming the $5000 checks (after his team wins) will be to pay back Americans for suffering through the Biden presidency.

→ More replies (11)

24

u/notarockclimber 1d ago

Understatement of the year…..

12

u/porgy_tirebiter 1d ago

Don’t worry. I have it on good authority that the war will be over right after the midterm election.

2

u/dlxnj 23h ago

Which is arguably a good thing for the world 

→ More replies (10)

34

u/TintedApostle 23h ago

Trump and Hegseth have failed in every way. A total disgrace.

Who will they bribe, blame or scapegoat here?

11

u/TomT060404 22h ago

Transgender people and immigrants with skin darker than a sheet of paper.

8

u/GumboMustBeDestroyed 23h ago

Kamala laughed funny, we had no choice

4

u/HarryPotterCum 21h ago

You’re asking the wrong question and are looking at this from the wrong perspective. It’s all been an incredible success. 

Ask who already bribed Trump to get into this mess, to run up the prices on shipping, oil, weapons manufacturing, freight insurance, etc…. Ask who is making money off all of this. 

→ More replies (2)

45

u/KaiserSoze-is-KPax 1d ago

Thank you mr president

6

u/ours 1d ago

So much winning. Are you tired yet?

19

u/Nearbyatom 1d ago

Come midterms or 2028 general elections somehow the democrats will get the blame for this.

14

u/marioandl_ 22h ago

correct. the media has already started selling the lie that vance was against this disaster

8

u/hennabeak 23h ago

Great time to invest in South African shipping and ports.

6

u/noodlearmdiscgolfer 19h ago

We need to be done with gasoline for cars. Yes we need oil for plastics and many other manufacturing processes but have enough domestic production for that. It’s too easy to bomb refining as Ukraine and Iran has shown or to choke supply lines or take out pipelines. Ramp up EVs and renewable power. It’s going to happen with $7 gas so let’s get on with it.

5

u/issm 17h ago

Instructions unclear, US government to invest billions tearing down renewable projects.

30

u/Intellectual-Hamster 1d ago

Maybe we shouldn't have stuck our dicks in a hornet's nest...

10

u/Realanise1 23h ago

It's almost like this disaster could have been avoided if an orange thing hadn't started a war.

2

u/Menkhal 22h ago

And it's a problem that would be immediately solved as soon as they left and came back to their country.

Stop messing around in the Middle East, get out, and there won't be a problem any longer. Just like there was no problem before the US and Israel decided to make one.

4

u/ScarSignal7723 21h ago

but 9/11 never forget? you can only kill so many millions and displace hundreds of thousands of families in the middle east before 5 of them get together out of resentment and anger for what you did.

but then they are labeled as terrorists when you have mined their land for your own gain and agenda :)

israel and america have put this world through so much pain and hell

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/DistanceToEmpty 1d ago

Now Trump has lost two strategic choke points.

14

u/Tribe303 1d ago

laughs nervously in Canadian

Russia can't get oil to market due to Iranian attacks. The Saudis can't get oil to market due to Iranian/Houthis attacks, Venezuela can't get oil to market because of Venezuela. China and the US ain't selling, leaving Canada the last major oil supplier, next down the list is... Brazil? 

9

u/Elendel19 23h ago

But the US doesn’t need anything from us, remember?

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Throwawayalt129 1d ago

They've also landed a direct strike on the Saudi East-West pipeline, causing damage in about 8 places. The EW pipeline was the only Saudi export route for oil that didn't pass through the Strait of Hormuz, meaning the Houthis have effectively eliminating the ability for the Saudis to move oil at all. This removes I believe about 5 million barrels of oil a day from the market. Get ready to see prices you didn't even imagine were possible.

15

u/Strontiumdogs1 1d ago

Great work you big Orange cunt.

4

u/S1DC 20h ago

My Trumpy friend said he voted for Trump for "no more wars"

Lol

5

u/watmore1 15h ago

Sad isn't it. Oil was flowing everywhere before T launched is ill fated war.

6

u/spiderham42 1d ago

I guess consequences are a bitch.

9

u/OLPopsAdelphia 1d ago

Look on the bright side: If this administration doesn’t get voted out, economic collapse is going to cause people to pull them out!

Happy Friday!

5

u/chaddwith2ds 22h ago

I thought this was one of the wars we already won? /s

6

u/Craigboy23 22h ago

By my count, we've won it at least 30 times.

3

u/GeekyTexan 18h ago

It seems like Saudi Arabia should have enough money to have their own military instead of expecting the US to do everything for them.

Most of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, but they are asking us for help.

7

u/wip30ut 22h ago

that Iran War sure went well! Glad to see that Tehran learned its lesson. /s

3

u/Night_Chicken 1d ago

Iranian proxy that has been "totally disabled" says what?

5

u/No_Criticism_5861 22h ago

I know this isn't good for the people living in that area, nor is it good for gas prices, but seeing trump lose a war to the strait of hormuz does my heart a lot of good

4

u/zephyroxyl 22h ago

We all know what needs to happen

6

u/GabeTheWarlock 1d ago

Let's goooooo! Amazing to see them push back against American and Saudi imperialism and genocide from such an underdog starting point

10

u/Evilkoikoi 1d ago

Is someone in the state department dictating to these news agencies how they should talk? It’s so weird to see the Iran-backed line inserted into every headline. You have very little space in the headline so why is it so important that you put that specific line in there? It’s so strange.

25

u/Specific-Path3179 1d ago

Your free press hasn't said a peep about Mitch McConnell being dead for 3 months, what do you think.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/ProofByVerbosity 1d ago

Whats weird about it? They are backed by Iran and I have no doubt a bunch of people still dont know that.

9

u/Evilkoikoi 23h ago

Why not US-backed Ukraine, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi, Kuwait. Why not UAE-backed Sudan terrorists? Why not US-backed ISIS Syrian president?

→ More replies (3)

11

u/sanctaphrax 1d ago

Seems pretty important, too, when Iran is currently at war with the US.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/papel_paperless 23h ago

How is Panama felling these days?

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Bocote 1d ago

2026 started up wild, and it just keeps getting worse.

4

u/ObliqueTravel 1d ago

Hasn't shipping in the red sea already been down like 50% over the last 2-3 years?

4

u/RhythmsaDancer 20h ago

It was the alternative to the Strait of Hormuz lmao

→ More replies (1)

10

u/UnionGuyCanada 1d ago

Another US win. Destroyed bases, ships fleeing, carrier fleets exhausted, soldiers dead and billions wasted just to have Iran more powerful than ever.

2

u/TatarAmerican 1d ago

My man with the bazooka is high on khat.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Oregon-Pilot 1d ago

Almost like Trump has no fucking clue what he’s doing because he’s fucking stupid. And we all get to pay the price. Well done Trump voters, well done!!

2

u/DogblackMichigan 1d ago

Saudi Arabia can’t beat the Houthis even with the best American weapons. They abandon Abrams tanks to the slightest resistance.

2

u/WorryNew3661 23h ago

Sure, why not at this point. Any other places someone wants to shut down while we're at it?

2

u/RicRacer 23h ago

I'm so old I remember when the shipping lanes were wide open. Thanks Trump and Republicans. 

2

u/Deep__Deep 19h ago

I am so confused…?!?! Trump said it is open and that he is going to call it the Trump Straight.

2

u/Antraxess 14h ago

GOP are destroying the world to aid putin and rob us blind

The child rape parties are just a bonus.

Will someone rid us of these turbulent pedophiles

2

u/Sea-Rip-9635 23h ago

Good To hell with the USA

1

u/Narradisall 22h ago

I can sense has prices are coming down any day now.

Any…. Day….

3

u/caeseron 16h ago

Funny thing is I'd rather have iran control the oil than America.