r/comics Finessed Impropriety 15h ago

25 years ago today

28.9k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.8k

u/Milestailsprowe 15h ago

I was in fifth grade in Queens NY that day. I remember teachers screaming and crying. The day was over and we were told to read. Parents taking kids out one by one with names being called over the speakers. I was excited when mines was called till I say my mother covered in Tower dust crying. 

This country was never the same after

2.1k

u/BabyLegsOShanahan 14h ago

I hope your mom was okay knowing what we know about the dust.

158

u/Emotional-Ad9114 14h ago

wait what do we know about the dust? (I’m not american)

597

u/sexykristinith 14h ago

The dust caused cancer. Lots and lots of cancer.

883

u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 14h ago edited 14h ago

Cancer that killed a good majority of the firefighters that survived. Funding that was attempted to be cut by mitch McConnell and Mike Johnson only to be defended by, of all people, the amazing Jon Stewart

https://www.911memorial.org/connect/blog/op-ed-why-jon-stewart-fights-those-sick-and-dying-911-related-illnesses

234

u/PrudentCarter 14h ago

I remember he fought pretty hard for it. He was seriously disappointed when they wouldn't even show up to the meeting for it.

200

u/peachesfordinner BumBum Ouchie 14h ago

He did the impossible. He made them feel shame on their cold dead hearts for just a moment

186

u/TemporaryMagician 13h ago

The more cynical take is that they never felt shame, but Jon's advocacy as a celebrity brought unwelcome publicity to their mistreatment of universally valorized heroes.

63

u/peachesfordinner BumBum Ouchie 13h ago

Oh that certainly was the effective weapon he used

2

u/SheDevilWithANewGig 1h ago

Yep. They calculated the optics and political impact only. They don’t give a fuck

u/wex118 50m ago

Right. If anything they just felt annoyance at having to yield on the issue.

0

u/Supyloco 12h ago

That would still be shame.

6

u/thedarkone47 7h ago

annoyance at getting caught isn't shame.

6

u/Bun_Wrangler 11h ago

Because they don't care. It's a great tool to stir up memories to try and win some patriotic votes. Clearly from peoples experiences in this post. Its nothing more then a cynical tool, they could have passed a law that day. That would medically cover all the victims and first responders. They didn't, they were to focused on the opportunity to galvanize the public for never ending wars.

I say this in good faith and from personal experience. 9/11 is nothing more then a tool to them. It can garner votes, silence political opponents and always be used for some good press with a hollow ceremony.

Trump has Howard Ludnick(how ever you spell his last name) in his cabinet. His brother died in 9/11 as their company was in one of the towers. He played a real good sob story, made it seem like he cared and helped setup a fund to support the families of the deceased. The loophole, was that there wasn't a limit on the amount that could be paid out. He took the whole think, I can't remember the exact number, but it was more then a couple million. So that's who we have in government. People who have no problem using 9/11 for personal gain.

111

u/Guiano 14h ago

I remember this story, and it’s not like I’m ignorant of the state of US politics but man. It’s always the ones who are supposedly full of patriotism who over and over take action against the needs of those that fought and gave the ultimate sacrifice for this country. And their supporters don’t bat an eye.

I don’t fucking get it.

74

u/Winter_Preference287 14h ago

You get it, it's just hard to accept there are demons who act like this for political points and call themselves patriots. Conservatives are very good at getting people focused on one issue while the rob you on 5 others. Just like a bunch of pick pockets, except their actions kill millions and as long as those super PAC donations keep coming, they couldn't care less.

15

u/hallucinating 14h ago

I wonder what it's like inside their heads. They can't all be psychopaths so why do they have so little empathy 🤔

20

u/Winter_Preference287 13h ago

Being a lap dog to the upper class has its perks. They get to sell out 300 million people while their masters flood the country with social media and fake news to keep us distracted in a culture war while they speed run robotics so we're not needed

13

u/saltycouchpotato 13h ago

At least 1% of the population has psychopathic traits so I can assure you, there are many psychopaths in the halls of power and the heads of state. But remember, not all psychopaths enact harm, especially to this degree. We are dealing with psychopaths who are gleefully harming others. We have sadists, narcissists, and machiavellian dark triad mfers on our hands.

2

u/Redditsucks547 11h ago

I can answer this. It’s very very intoxicating to be powerful and rich. That’s why they hold on for so long.

0

u/DOWNVOTES_SYNDROME 3h ago

why not? why can't they be?

do you not have an understanding of numbers or math?

there are tens of millions of sociopaths and psychopaths in this country, alone, based on %s and how common those conditions are. and that's IGNORING people who have little to no empathy for other reasons, which there are many

why is it so hard to believe that people flock to jobs that reward their worst attributes. it works for the cops and it sure as fuck works for republican politicians and influencers and shit.

1

u/hallucinating 3h ago

Do you not know how to have a civil discussion?

1

u/DOWNVOTES_SYNDROME 2h ago

i can't, but i'm sick and tired of people seeing the evidence of horrific people with no morals and no conscience destroying the world around them, and shrug their shoulders in disbelief, saying "well, surely some of them are fine people! i'm sure any day now one of them will come around and all of this will be fixed and ok! they just need to look inside their hearts!!"

civility in the face of willful ignorance has gotten us where we are today

civility in the face of the lies of sociopaths got us to trump, and a nation afraid of everything, always (especially nothing). instead of uniting and becoming better, together, we let a group of the worst people in this nation's history destroy us from the inside, while we sat and waited, confident that, one day, all of those good people will just decide to take a stand. cause surely, hundreds-to-thousands of people can't be sociopaths in a nation of 300million where the incidence of sociopathy is upwards of 4% (which means more than 12 million people), and roughly 1 out of every 20 people you meet.

1

u/hallucinating 1h ago

Not even remotely what I said. I'm also not from the US. And the prevalent statistics for psychopaths in the US is 1 in 100 people. Perhaps the whole Republican party is full of them. I was merely wondering how these people can behave in such an awful way and show no empathy as, statistically, it's unlikely every single one is a psychopath but perhaps they are. Not sure why that triggered you.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Guiano 12h ago

I do, there are just those rare moments where the real weight of how broken it all is hits me in a way it usually doesn’t, and this was one of those times.

3

u/Tru3insanity 11h ago

Unfortunately patriotism is often just another kind of virtue theater. Some people wanna feel like the heroes without ever actually lifting a finger to help someone.

2

u/patsully98 13h ago

It would be universally popular and so easy to just do the right thing here, but it just never crosses the minds of some people we elect to represent us.

180

u/Shantotto11 14h ago

*Jon Stewart

The one with the H in his name is the Green Lantern.

89

u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 14h ago

Awwww beans you're right lemme fix that

105

u/Space_Vaquero73 14h ago

Well they are both superhereos so it's understandable.

47

u/Shantotto11 14h ago

The most valid takeaway.

24

u/CrazyHorseWakaWaka 13h ago

Of all the celebrities, this is the one guy I respect. He fought for those that those in power decided were inconveniences to be swept aside and forgotten.

6

u/SpotweldPro1300 13h ago

If any Stewart should get a Green Lantern ring, it's Jon.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/No_Recognition_3729 12h ago

Jon Stewart is better than a superhero. He advocates for actual change rather than maintaining the status quo.

17

u/drsideburns 13h ago

"awwww beans" lol i'm gonna steal that man. that's adorable.

5

u/DarkMelody42 13h ago

I read this comment in the barbarians voice. Thank you for this

5

u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 13h ago

25

u/Emotional-Ad9114 14h ago

was not expecting this thread to have a Green Lantern reference 😭

37

u/Shantotto11 14h ago

I was. Jon Stewart is probably known second most for his advocacy for 9/11 survivors and first responders.

It took me years to figure out how to properly spell both of the their names correctly. I’ve been spelling GL’s name as “John Stuart” for longer than I care to admit.

7

u/OriginalDavid 14h ago

J'hon

10

u/Shantotto11 13h ago

No, that’s the detective from Mars. /s

2

u/TheBKnight3 12h ago

From "Comedy Channel"

29

u/Trips-Over-Tail 14h ago

Our Jon is more deserving of the ring.

20

u/VengeanceKnight 14h ago

DC’s John would agree.

57

u/BadmiralHarryKim 14h ago

Mitch McConnell, Senator from Kentucky celebrated as coal country, took time out from trying to cut health funding for Black Lung, the most well known coal miner's disease, to also try and cut funding for 9/11 related respiratory care?

Hard to believe he took his eye off the ball screwing over coal miners just to stick it too 9/11 rescuer toos. Unless some of them were also coal miners?

Anyway, fuck that guy.

13

u/Broke-Down-Toad 12h ago

Don't forget all the fighting that had to be done to get veterans who were exposed to burn pits covered by the VA

40

u/mittenknittin 13h ago

Mike Rogers, who is trying to smear Abdul El-Sayed about 9/11 because he's Muslim, voted twice to cut funding for first responders

6

u/patsully98 13h ago

Rogers is not exactly a Rhodes Scholar. El-Sayed is literally a Rhodes Scholar!

4

u/Annalog 13h ago

I wish someone with the same convictions, charisma, moral compass, and ferocity for justice as Jon would run for president. I realize Jon would never do it. We also don’t need more celebs doing it but damn I’d be lying if I hadn’t thought about it

2

u/_JustCallMeBen_ 8h ago

The moral failure of the entire political class is so absolute when a fucking comedian is the one that finally gets things done for firefighters that gave up their health to help others.

25

u/Emotional-Ad9114 14h ago

oh shit, that sucks!

70

u/HailMadScience 14h ago

So many toxic things. Asbestos, lead, PCBs, fine particle dust, and so much more. Anyone who got hit with dust in NYC that day is basically at high risk for dozens of terrible conditions and diseases.

33

u/work_work-work 14h ago

Yeah, just driving by the ruins made my eyes tear and asthma kick in for months afterwards.

2

u/ThatOneGuy308 12h ago

At least we don't make buildings out of toxic materials anymore...

6

u/Wobbelblob 9h ago

Doesn't really matter in such a case. Carcinogenic materials are usually not toxic (stuff like lead aside) but simply so small that they can get into your lungs and such. And in such an event, the air is filled with extremely fine particle dust of concrete, glass and other normal building materials. Not that concrete dust is much more healthy.

2

u/ThatOneGuy308 3h ago

Oh, I was mostly being sarcastic, lol.

Yeah, pretty much every building we have is still going to be a major problem in such a scenario, besides maybe a log cabin or something.

4

u/Wobbelblob 3h ago

I am aware, just wanted to add that in case someone thinks that it is possible to make such an event not incredibly unhealthy. And even a log cabin will be, at least when it goes up in smoke.

1

u/ThatOneGuy308 2h ago

True, though I suppose it would still be far less carcinogenic by comparison, given that wood smoke is fairly commonplace to be exposed to and isn't particularly regulated.

Like it's usage in fireplaces, outdoor fire pits, or in various cooking usages where smoke is infused into food and directly consumed.

And smoke is pretty much a daily exposure for firefighters.

3

u/Wobbelblob 2h ago

I mean yes, but firefighters try to stay as far away from the smoke as possible and utilize heavy breathing equipment if they can't. Soot and woodsmoke are incredibly carcinogenic. To the point where firefighters in my country change clothes as soon as possible, even having a specifically equipped car for it. And they try to not touch it without gloves, just because of the soot and everything that is on the jacket. They reason why it is not as heavily regulated is likely because a) it is simply not as common as it once was and b) people try to get away from wood smoke by themself because it smells bad and makes breathing hard.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/heckhammer 13h ago

One of my best friends worked for Verizon and was down there for 2 years straight. He says it's just a ticking clock at this point.

2

u/leomonster 12h ago

Is this because of the materials used to build the towers? Are those materials still used today in buildings?

2

u/QuoteGiver 5h ago

Even the modern stuff that we think (for now) isn’t tooooo toxic when used properly is generally still toxic when burned or smashed into airborne dust.

Don’t hang around on construction sites or near burning building materials for fun, yeah.

u/Green_Tea_Budgie 17m ago

Yup… I’m a cancer nurse in NYC and a lot of my patients were affected. So freaking sad.

96

u/BabyLegsOShanahan 14h ago

It was extremely toxic and many people who were exposed got really sick and died in the time after. Some are still here, but in bad shape.

141

u/king_crescentmoon 14h ago

Asbestos was used in buildings back then plus all the damage to the building left the dust in the air extremely toxic. It’s been linked to multiple cancer cases, like exceeding the death toll of 9/11 itself! Our gov didn’t provide any healthcare to these ppl.

If you look up “The Dust Lady” you’ll find more/better info on the subject. 🩷

45

u/Emotional-Ad9114 14h ago

omg that’s terrible. I remember my high school still had asbestos on the roof (and I graduated in 2021) and there were tons of protests by teachers and parents about it in my school and other old schools but the government did nothing about it.

and thanks 🫶🏻 I’ll look into it!

63

u/warbastard 14h ago

Asbestos in old buildings is incredibly common and so long as it’s not deteriorating or being broken apart and drilled into (making the fibres airborne and breathable) it’s generally fine.

Two gigantic towers collapsing containing asbestos is a public health disaster. And it’s sad that America spent way more money fighting overseas than helping heal its own citizens.

8

u/Bendlerp 12h ago

Yep. Removal can create even bigger issues assuming it's not degraded.

3

u/BeanBopJop 7h ago

Not only asbestos but material from the computers, lights, furniture, rugs, broken glass & fiberglass, etc...

23

u/toot_suite 14h ago

Unfortunately every commercial or government or healthcare building constructed before the 80s, even 90s had asbestos in it. Vinyl composite tiles? Asbestos. Insulation? Asbestos. Pipe wrap? Asbestos. Void fill? Asbestos. Acoustic tiles? Asbestos.

13

u/TheGodDamn1TaGo 14h ago

How about some asbestos for your asbestos?

8

u/Jelly_Kitti 13h ago

Only if it comes with a side of asbestos

2

u/MechAegis 10h ago

Need something to wash down that asbestos? How about a nice cool drink of asbestos.

7

u/Redditsucks547 11h ago

For anyone reading this and not aware. Asbestos is EXTREMELY fire retardant making it very useful as insulation.

4

u/Wobbelblob 9h ago

And as far as I am aware, it is still, to this day, the best material for that we have. We just accept a faster fire spread in the event so that we do not have to deal with asbestos as much.

40

u/JesterInTheDark 14h ago

As others have said it caused cancer but another not so fun fact is that the cities administrations got the past 25 years have covered up the fact that the area was still toxic to be in for months after the attack. So if just the air was toxic for months after, just imagine what being there at ground zero would’ve done to someone

31

u/Orbiter277 14h ago

It was/is carcinogenic (can cause cancer)

20

u/RussianBearFight 14h ago

It's not good for you

18

u/JaneTheEel 14h ago

Very toxic

14

u/Original_Canadian 14h ago

The dust was extremely carcinogenic

11

u/NBCMarketingTeam 14h ago

Lots and lots of carcinogens (asbestos, et al.)

11

u/SirDucky 14h ago

Because it was basically a vaporized mix of skyscraper materials, it was very bad for you to breathe in. Lots of rescue workers got cancer or respiratory issues

9

u/Ghost-Music 14h ago

It has caused a lot of health issues, including cancer which has been responsible for deaths.

16

u/MaddysinLeigh 14h ago

As other people said, cancer causing shit. I do want to add that comedian and Daily Show host Jon Stewart has been a huge supporter of the first responders. He’s talked to congress (I think it was congress) about improving the health care they receive.

8

u/Sintuition 13h ago

So much asbestos and other carcinogens that more people died from the dust than the damage from the attacks.

And it was covered up very well.

7

u/MyDisappointedDad 14h ago

Turns out breaking concrete, computer, and various building materials isn't good for you.

6

u/DanerysTargaryen 14h ago

There was a lot of dangerous chemicals/materials in that dust (asbestos, mercury, and lead - just to name a few of many bad things). It caused cancer and early deaths in a lot of people that breathed it in.

12

u/Norway643 14h ago

Asbestos i believe

5

u/pamcakevictim 14h ago

And they knew about the dust within three weeks of the towers coming down and they covered it up, giuliani, covered it up

6

u/PokecheckHozu 12h ago

In addition to what everyone else has said, the government hid information about it from the people, until the current mayor of NYC released over 100k documents about it 25 years later. They knew and didn't tell anyone.

1

u/Emotional-Ad9114 11h ago

that is crazy!!

4

u/MindlessBullet 14h ago

Caused a lot of long term health issues and cancer to everyone nearby.

4

u/Psychological_Ad1518 13h ago

Iirc it was at the time where Asbestos was all the rage, and if not Legally Asbestos, then the materials that are legally not asbestos but are asbestos like enough to have the same effect on your body. And also just breathing in concrete dust is not good. And even if you couldn't see the dust in the air, the concentration of particulates was still high enough to cause problems for a long time after. Afaik, more people died not during the direct attacks on the towers, but from the dust and debris that took a long time to clean up and/or get under control.

2

u/Boring-Philosophy-46 3h ago edited 3h ago

Asbestos plus lots of burning plastic (for weeks) plus finely ground glass, plastics and concrete is the perfect mix of carcinogens and mechanical damage causing agents to cause lots of problems. Fine particolate gets through the lungs into the blood to cause inflammation. Also not American but it's a no brainer that stuff was going to be bad bad. 

Unfortunately asbestos cancer takes about 25-35 years after exposure, so more people will die in the next decade of mesothelioma as with this huge number of people exposed some will inevitably get it.